Technical Documentation — Experimental Research Device
Searl Effect Generator
+ IPC Integration
Inductive Pulse Charging · Flyback Harvesting · Self-Sufficiency Architecture
3
Stator Rings
24
Rollers Total
MJL21194G
NDR Transistor
CoP > 1
Target Metric
LiFePO₄
Receiving Battery
UF4007
Flyback Diodes
// 00

Introduction & Scope

⚠ Research Context This document describes an experimental device whose underlying claims — Searl's self-sustaining generator effect and IPC Coefficient of Performance > 1 — have not been conclusively proven under peer-reviewed conditions. Build and test rigorously. All measurements should be treated as data to be published, not as pre-confirmed results. High voltages (up to 2 kV), strong NdFeB fields, and fast-rotating composite components are involved. Follow all safety protocols in Section 16.

This manual integrates two research lineages: John Searl's Searl Effect Generator (SEG) — a layered NdFeB/copper/aluminium/nylon ring-and-roller electromagnetic device claimed to produce self-sustaining electrical output — and Julian Perry's Inductive Pulse Charging (IPC) framework, which documents anomalous Coefficient of Performance (>1) in lead-acid and LiFePO₄ batteries charged by flyback pulses from collapsing magnetic fields.

The integration thesis is straightforward: the SEG's mechanical roller-on-ring architecture is a natural analogue of the Bedini SG pulse motor. Each roller pass generates a sharp dΦ/dt in the stator coils, collapses the field, and produces a flyback spike. If that spike is routed through an MJL21194G-class BJT in its negative-differential-resistance (NDR) avalanche region and harvested into a LiFePO₄ battery, the IPC literature suggests a measurable CoP advantage that — if combined with the SEG's claimed self-spin — could push toward energetic self-sufficiency.

PHASE 1
Magnetics
Weeks 1–6
PHASE 2
Coils
Weeks 7–10
PHASE 3
IPC Circuit
Weeks 11–14
PHASE 4
Assembly
Weeks 15–18
PHASE 5
Testing
Weeks 19+
// 01

Operating Principles

1.1 SEG Mechanism

The SEG consists of three concentric stator rings, each carrying a set of cylindrical rollers. Both rings and rollers are manufactured as four-layer composites: an innermost NdFeB magnetic core, copper layer, aluminium layer, and outer nylon shell. The rollers are magnetised in a compound segmented pattern (~15–20° off radial, Halbach-inspired) that produces a travelling magnetic wave as they orbit the ring, providing self-driving torque once a threshold speed is reached — analogous to a linear induction motor operating in reverse.

The stator rings carry toroidal pickup coils. As each roller passes, it induces a sharp dΦ/dt in the coil, producing an EMF pulse. The copper and aluminium layers in both rings and rollers contribute eddy-current coupling that modifies the pulse waveform. The nylon outer layer accumulates triboelectric/electret charge, adding an electrostatic component to the induced pulse.

1.2 IPC Flyback Mechanism

When the roller departs a stator coil region, the collapsing magnetic field induces a reverse-EMF spike (Lenz's Law) that can reach 10–100× the supply voltage. This "flyback" pulse, routed through an MJL21194G NPN transistor operating in its negative-differential-resistance (NDR) avalanche region, produces a qualitatively distinct waveform — characterised by very short rise time (<100 ns), extremely high peak voltage (200–800 V), and a specific displacement-current component that the IPC literature associates with anomalous battery charging behaviour.

Perry's research documents that the energy gains are realised inside the battery — in the electrochemical environment — not in the pulse circuit itself. The circuit's conventional efficiency is only 15–30%, but the gains at the battery can more than offset this.

Target PRF (battery-tuned)
1–5
kHz (LiFePO₄ optimum)
Peak flyback voltage
200–800
V (MJL21194G range)
BJT pulse rise time
< 100
ns (avalanche region)
IPC circuit efficiency
15–30
% (conventional)
Reported max CoP (Perry)
~38×
LiFePO₄, 18 Ah
Roller gap to ring
0.5–1.0
mm (magnetic bearing)
// 02

System Overview Drawing

The following drawing shows the complete SEG-IPC integrated system: mechanical section (top), IPC harvesting circuit (middle), and self-loop battery management (bottom).

DWG-001 — SEG-IPC Integrated System Block Diagram
MECHANICAL — SEG ROTOR ASSEMBLY IPC HARVESTING CIRCUIT BATTERY MANAGEMENT — SELF-LOOP RING 1 HUB Ring 1 Ø80/110 mm · 25 mm wide · 4× rollers Ring 2 Ø220/260 mm · 35 mm wide · 8× rollers Ring 3 Ø400/460 mm · 50 mm wide · 12× rollers Each roller: NdFeB | Cu | Al | Nylon (4-layer) STATOR COILS 3x rings, 8 coils each TRIFILAR wound A: Drive / B: Pickup / C: Trigger Core: ferrite toroid / air-core dPhi/dt pulses NDR BJT MJL21194G 250V · 16A · 200W Avalanche region Filar C (trigger) FLYBACK DIODE UF4007 1000V · 75ns t_rr NOT 1N4007 flyback CAP DUMP 2× 22,000µF / 75V LM311 comparator IRFP260N dump FET CLAMP NE-2 neon bulb TVS diode 1.5KE BJT over-V protection BATTERY A RUN (driving) 12.8V LiFePO₄ 18 Ah AGM / LFP Coulomb counter Yokogawa WT310 BATTERY B RECEIVING (charging) 12.8V LiFePO₄ 18 Ah AGM / LFP Midtronics MDX-650 SoC logging BATTERY C RESTING (equalising) 12.8V LiFePO₄ 18 Ah AGM / LFP 60 min rest period DPDT relay swap SWAP CONTROLLER Arduino Mega / Teensy 4.1 5–60 min clock timer Omron G7L DPDT 30A relays 4N35 optoisolator drive MBR3045 blocking Schottky HV pulse dump 12V drive to coil filar A rotate rotate INSTRUMENTS Yokogawa WT310E Power analyser Tek TBS2204B 200MHz scope PEM CWT Rogowski Current probes Gaussmeter + FLIR Thermal camera
// 03

Ring Cross-Sections

The following drawing shows a dimensioned cross-section through Ring 3 (outermost) and a detail of the four-layer composite construction. All three rings follow identical layer proportions scaled to their respective diameters.

DWG-002 — Ring Cross-Section & Layer Detail (Ring 3, to scale)
RING 3 — AXIAL FACE (cross-section, not to scale, proportional) NYLON-12 OUTER — 4mm ALUMINIUM 6061-T6 — 8mm COPPER C110 ETP — 8mm NdFeB N45 CORE — 10mm 50 mm axial width RING 3 — RADIAL PROFILE (layer stack) Nylon — 4mm Aluminium — 8mm Copper — 8mm NdFeB N45 — 10mm 30mm radial RING DIMENSIONS TABLE RING ID / OD AXIAL WIDTH ROLLERS ROLLER Ø × L NYLON AL CU NdFeB Ring 1 80 / 110 mm 25 mm 20 × 25 mm 1.5 mm 3 mm 3 mm 5 mm Ring 2 220 / 260 mm 35 mm 30 × 35 mm 2 mm 5 mm 5 mm 8 mm Ring 3 400 / 460 mm 50 mm 12× 45 × 50 mm 4 mm 8 mm 8 mm 10 mm * NdFeB grade N45, 12-segment Halbach-inspired compound pole pattern, 15–20° off-radial magnetisation. * Copper: C110 ETP (electrolytic tough pitch). Aluminium: 6061-T6. Nylon: PA-12 Nylon 12. Roller gap to ring surface: 0.5–1.0 mm. * All dimensions nominal; final tolerances to be set after FEMM flux simulation and machining. * Ring 3 has 8 stator coils; Ring 2 has 6; Ring 1 has 4. Total 18 coil stations.
// 04

Roller Detail Drawing

DWG-003 — Roller Assembly (Ring 3, Ø45×50mm) — Longitudinal Section + End View
LONGITUDINAL SECTION (A-A) Nylon-12 Aluminium Copper NdFeB 4-seg 50 mm length (axial) Ø 45 mm END VIEW — SECTION A-A 15–20° off-radial compound tilt Nylon-12 Al 6061 Cu C110 NdFeB N45 NOTES: (1) NdFeB segments to be magnetised after final machining of composite assembly. (2) Copper and Al layers press-fit or epoxy-bonded (3M DP420 structural epoxy, cure at 65°C/2hr). (3) Nylon outer shell injection-moulded or machined from Nylon-12 bar stock; surface-finish Ra ≤ 0.8µm. (4) Electret-charge nylon via corona discharge (20kV needle, 15mm gap, dry air RH <30%) after full assembly.
// 05

Coil Winding Detail

DWG-004 — Trifilar Toroidal Stator Coil (Ring 3 Station, Ferrite Core)
Ferrite toroid core µi ≈ 125–2000 | T200-52 FILAR A — Drive (AWG 18, ~130ft) FILAR B — Pickup/IPC (AWG 18, ~130ft) FILAR C — Trigger (AWG 23, ~20ft, 1:5 turns ratio) A1 B1 C1 A2 B2 C2 WINDING SPEC CORE: Amidon T200-52 (Ring 3) µi=75, OD=51mm, or custom wound ferrite on alt: air-core FILAR A (Drive): AWG 18 (1.02mm) enamelled Cu ~200 turns, 2-5Ω DC resistance Connected: 3-phase BLDC ESC FILAR B (Pickup/IPC): AWG 18 (1.02mm) enamelled Cu ~200 turns bifilar with A Connected: UF4007 → cap dump FILAR C (Trigger): AWG 23 (0.57mm) enamelled Cu ~40 turns (1:5 turns ratio vs A/B) Connected: BJT base via 470Ω+1kΩpot Filar A Filar B Filar C
// 06

IPC Circuit Schematic

DWG-005 — IPC Flyback Harvesting Circuit (per ring station)
BAT A 12.8V LiFePO₄ + L (Filar B) Trig (Filar C) 470Ω 1kΩ MJL 21194G B C E NE-2 UF4007 1000V 75ns NOT 1N4007! 2×22mF 75V low-ESR LM311 Comparator Vref = 60V IRFP 260N BAT B 12.8V charge LiFePO₄
⚠ Critical Diode Note The flyback diode MUST be UF4007 (or MUR160, HER308 — ultrafast, t_rr ≤ 75 ns). A standard 1N4007 has a 2–30 µs reverse-recovery time and will lose the entire radiant spike. This is the single most common error in Bedini-topology replicators.
// 07

Self-Loop Topology

DWG-006 — 3-Battery Rotation Self-Loop (Lindemann/Stafford Architecture)
SEG-IPC Ring-roller assembly Trifilar coils IPC flyback circuit 3× MJL21194G + cap-dump BATTERY A DRIVING (run) 12.8V LiFePO₄ 18Ah Coulomb-metered ● ACTIVE NOW BATTERY B CHARGING (receive) 12.8V LiFePO₄ 18Ah SoC logging ● RECEIVING IPC BATTERY C RESTING (equalise) 12.8V LiFePO₄ 18Ah 60 min disconnect ○ RESTING 12.8V drive power to Filar A (coils) IPC flyback pulse cap-dump output SWAP CONTROLLER Teensy 4.1 · 5–60min timer · Omron G7L DPDT relays ↺ rotate roles every 5–60 min SELF-SUFFICIENCY VERIFICATION Measure all 3 battery SoC (after 1-hr rest) daily. No net SoC decline = self-sustained loop.
ℹ Battery Rotation Logic Roles rotate on a 5–60 minute clock (empirically determined per battery chemistry). After many cycles, if CoP > 1, all three batteries should show equal or rising net charge. Use mechanical DPDT relays (Omron G7L, 30 A continuous) — not solid-state switches — because relay contacts truly break the circuit. Add MBR3045 Schottky blocking diodes on each terminal to prevent contact-bounce back-feed.
// 08

Procurement List

The following tables list all components required for one complete SEG-IPC integrated generator. Components are grouped by subsystem. Manufacturer and supplier suggestions are included; alternatives exist in most categories.

8.1 Magnetic Core Components
NdFeB N45 Ring
NdFeB Ring Magnets — N45
Custom segmented, Ø varies per ring
Core magnetic element for all rings and rollers. Must be custom-machined and magnetised with compound-angle segmented pattern. Request un-magnetised blanks from manufacturer, then magnetise after assembly.
Suppliers: Eclipse Magnetics (UK) · Supermagnete (EU) · K&J Magnetics (US) · Bunting Magnetics (US/EU)
C110 ETP Copper Bar
Copper Bar Stock — C110 ETP
Various diameters, to be machined
Electrolytic Tough Pitch copper for the diamagnetic coupling layer. Machine to ring and roller geometry after NdFeB core is fitted. High purity essential (≥99.9% Cu).
Suppliers: Metals4U (UK) · Online Metals (US) · Aalco Metals (UK) · McMaster-Carr (US)
6061-T6 Aluminium Bar
Aluminium Bar Stock — 6061-T6
Various diameters, to be machined
Paramagnetic aluminium for eddy-current coupling layer. 6061-T6 gives good machinability. Machine before Cu and NdFeB assembly — tight fit tolerance ±0.02mm.
Suppliers: Metals4U (UK) · metals-express.co.uk (UK) · Online Metals (US) · Aluminium Warehouse (UK)
Nylon-12 PA12 Rod/Tube
Nylon-12 (PA12) Bar Stock
Various diameters, natural colour
Outer dielectric/triboelectric layer. PA12 preferred over PA6/66 for better moisture resistance and higher charge retention (electret stability). Machine to final fit. Surface finish Ra ≤ 0.8µm for consistent triboelectric behaviour.
Suppliers: Ensinger Plastics (EU/UK) · Mitsubishi Chemical (worldwide) · ePlastics (US) · Plasticsheetsshop.co.uk (UK)
ItemSpec / Part No.QtyEst. CostSupplier
NdFeB Ring blanks (Ring 1)Ø110×80×25mm, N45, un-magnetised2 (spare)£120–200 eaEclipse Magnetics / Bunting
NdFeB Ring blanks (Ring 2)Ø260×220×35mm, N45, un-magnetised2 (spare)£400–800 eaEclipse Magnetics / Bunting
NdFeB Ring blanks (Ring 3)Ø460×400×50mm, N45, un-magnetised2 (spare)£1200–2000 eaEclipse Magnetics / Bunting
NdFeB Roller blanks (Ring 1)Ø5mm core × 25mm, N45, un-magnetised8 (spares)£20–40 eaSupermagnete / K&J
NdFeB Roller blanks (Ring 2)Ø8mm core × 35mm, N45, un-magnetised12 (spares)£40–80 eaSupermagnete / K&J
NdFeB Roller blanks (Ring 3)Ø10mm core × 50mm, N45, un-magnetised18 (spares)£80–150 eaSupermagnete / K&J
Cu C110 ETP barØ50mm round bar, 1m length3m total£80–120/mMetals4U / Online Metals
Al 6061-T6 barØ60mm round bar, 1m length3m total£30–50/mMetals4U / Aluminium Warehouse
Nylon-12 rodØ55mm PA12, 1m length2m total£40–70/mEnsinger / ePlastics
Structural epoxy3M DP420 Scotch-Weld 50ml5 cartridges£30–50 ea3M / RS Components
8.2 Coil Components
Ferrite T200-52
Amidon T200-52 Ferrite Toroid
OD=51mm, µi=75, powdered iron type 52
Core for Ring 1 coils. Type 52 material is optimal for 1–30 MHz. For Ring 2 and 3 coils (larger), use stacked T300-52 or custom wound toroids. Alternative: air-core bobbins (avoids NdFeB saturation concern).
Suppliers: Amidon Associates (US) · Fair-Rite (US) · Kits and Parts (US) · CPC Farnell (UK)
AWG18
Magnet Wire AWG 18 (1.02mm)
Enamelled copper, 200°C rating, 1 lb spool
Primary and pickup filars (A and B). High-temperature enamel (200°C) for longevity. Buy at least 2 lbs per ring station (18 stations = 36 lbs minimum). Resistance ~20.9 mΩ/ft at 20°C.
Suppliers: Remington Industries (US) · MWS Wire (US) · Farnell (UK) · RS Components (UK/EU)
AWG23
Magnet Wire AWG 23 (0.57mm)
Enamelled copper, trigger filar C
Trigger filar for the BJT base drive. ~40 turns per coil station (1:5 turns ratio vs drive filar). Smaller gauge for smaller trigger current. 1 lb spool is sufficient for all 18 stations.
Suppliers: Remington Industries (US) · MWS Wire (US) · RS Components (UK/EU)
8.3 IPC Harvesting Circuit Components
MJL 21194G NPN BJT
MJL21194G NPN Power BJT
250V, 16A, 200W, TO-264 package
Primary NDR/avalanche switching transistor. Buy from authorised distributors ONLY — counterfeits are common. Test each unit with avalanche-pulse tester before use. Buy 5–10× per ring station for spares.
Auth. distributors: Mouser Electronics · Digi-Key · RS Components · Farnell
UF4007 1000V 75ns
UF4007 Ultrafast Rectifier Diode
1000V, 1A, 75ns t_rr, DO-41
CRITICAL component. Must be ultrafast (t_rr ≤ 75ns). A standard 1N4007 will NOT work — 2–30µs reverse recovery loses the entire radiant spike. Alternatives: MUR160 (600V, 1A), HER308 (1000V, 3A) for higher current.
Suppliers: Mouser · Digi-Key · RS Components · LCSC (bulk/low cost)
22,000µF 75V
Electrolytic Capacitor 22,000µF / 75V
Low-ESR, 105°C rated, snap-in/screw
Cap-dump reservoir. Use two in parallel per IPC stage (= 44,000µF total). Low ESR is essential for fast dump discharge. Snap-in or screw-terminal for secure high-current connections. Nichicon or Rubycon preferred.
Suppliers: Mouser (Nichicon / Rubycon) · Digi-Key · RS Components
IRFP 260N N-FET 200V 50A
IRFP260N Power MOSFET
200V, 50A, TO-247, for cap-dump switch
Cap-dump switch (not the main IPC switch — that is the MJL21194G BJT). Triggered by LM311 comparator output via optoisolator. Heatsink required. Alternative: IXFH50N20 (200V, 50A) or STP80NF10 for lower voltage caps.
Suppliers: Mouser · Digi-Key · RS Components · Farnell
LM311 Comparator
LM311 Voltage Comparator
Single, DIP-8, 30V supply, open collector
Controls cap-dump MOSFET gate. Set Vref to 60–80% of cap rating (e.g. 55V for 75V cap). Open-collector output drives optoisolator to MOSFET gate. Use LM311N or LM311P (through-hole); LM393 for dual-comparator variant.
Suppliers: Mouser · Digi-Key · RS Components · LCSC
NE-2 Neon
NE-2 Neon Indicator / Clamp
90V strike, 65V hold, 0.3mA
Overvoltage clamp across BJT collector-emitter. Prevents transistor destruction if cap or charge battery disconnects. Place one across C-E of each MJL21194G. Also adds visual indication of flyback activity.
Suppliers: Mouser · Digi-Key · RS Components · any electronics supplier
ItemPart No. / SpecQty (for 3 ring-stations)Est. CostSupplier
MJL21194G BJTON Semi, TO-2649 (3/station + spares)£3–6 eaMouser / Digi-Key
UF4007 ultrafast diode1000V, 75ns, DO-4150 (many spares)£0.10–0.30 eaLCSC / Mouser / RS
MUR1560 diode (alt, higher I)600V, 15A, TO-220AC10£0.80–2 eaMouser / Digi-Key
22,000µF / 75V electrolyticNichicon LGJ series, 105°C6 (2/stage)£8–20 eaMouser / RS Components
IRFP260N MOSFET200V, 50A, TO-2476£3–6 eaMouser / Digi-Key
LM311 comparatorDIP-89£0.40–1 eaMouser / RS / LCSC
NE-2 neon bulbT-1¾, 90V, 0.3mA12£0.20–0.50 eaMouser / Farnell / eBay
1kΩ trimmer potBourns 3296W-1-102LF9£0.80–2 eaMouser / RS Components
470Ω 1W resistorMetal film, ±1%18£0.10–0.30 eaAny / Mouser / LCSC
4N35 optoisolatorDIP-6, CTR≥100%9£0.20–0.50 eaMouser / RS / LCSC
TVS diode 1.5KE200AUnidirectional, 200V clamp9£0.50–1 eaMouser / Digi-Key
Heatsink TO-264/TO-247Fischer SK68/25.4 or equiv.6£2–5 eaRS Components / Farnell
Ferrite toroid T200-52Amidon, OD=51mm, µi=7518 (+spares)£3–8 eaKits and Parts / Mouser
AWG 18 magnet wireEnamelled Cu, 200°C, 1 lb spool36 lb total (18 spools)£12–20/lbRemington Ind. / MWS Wire
AWG 23 magnet wireEnamelled Cu, 200°C3 lb total£12–20/lbRemington Ind. / MWS Wire
Prototype PCB / Perfboard100×150mm fibreglass6 boards£1–3 eaLCSC / AliExpress / RS
8.4 Battery Bank & Power Management
ItemSpecQtyEst. CostSupplier
LiFePO₄ 12.8V 18Ah batteryGrade A cells, BMS built-in, M6 terminals3 (A, B, C)£80–150 eaCATL / Eve / Poweroad / Amazon
Battery charger LiFePO₄14.6V CC/CV, 5A, for initial charging1£20–50Victron / NOCO / any branded
Omron G7L-1A-T DPDT relay30A, 250VAC coil 12V, swap controller6£8–15 eaRS Components / Mouser
MBR3045 Schottky blocking diode45V, 30A, TO-22012£1–3 eaMouser / Digi-Key
Teensy 4.1 microcontrollerARM M7 600MHz, battery swap timer1£25–35PJRC / Mouser / Digi-Key
Coulomb counter module100A shunt, I²C output, e.g. Adafruit 42263£10–20 eaAdafruit / Mouser
Midtronics MDX-650 conductance testerBattery health + SoC measurement1£150–300Midtronics / Battery Tools Direct
8.5 Instrumentation & Test Equipment
InstrumentModel / SpecPurposeEst. Cost
Power analyserYokogawa WT310E or WT330True RMS input/output power accounting. Essential for CoP calculation. Do not substitute with basic meters — they miss sub-µs spikes.£1500–4000
OscilloscopeTektronix TBS2204B (200 MHz, 4-ch)Waveform capture of flyback pulses. Must be ≥200 MHz for accurate ns-rise-time measurement. 4-channel needed for simultaneous trigger/drive/pickup/battery monitoring.£900–1500
Rogowski coil (current probe)PEM CWT015 or CWT030High-bandwidth (30 MHz) current measurement without ground-loop issues. Needed for measuring fast flyback current spikes — clamp meters are inadequate.£200–500 ea (×2)
GaussmeterAlphaLab GM2, 3-axis, 20kG rangeMap ring and roller flux density; monitor field changes during operation.£200–400
Thermal cameraFLIR E6 Pro or Seek ThermalMonitor ring/coil temperature anomalies. Searl claimed anomalous cooling — this would be clearly visible. Also detects overheating components.£400–900
Precision resistive loadVishay LPS series, 1Ω–100Ω, 5W–50WKnown load for battery discharge measurements in CoP protocol. Must be non-inductive wirewound or metal-film — no carbon resistors.£20–80 ea
Variable freq. drive (VFD)Huanyang HY-ND 3-phase, 0.5–2.2kWStartup drive for ring coils (BLDC phase-shifted AC). 3-phase output from single-phase input. Variable frequency 1–400 Hz for ramp-up.£80–200
Hall effect sensorsHoneywell SS495A (linear) or SS400 (digital)Roller position sensing for commutation timing and RPM measurement. One per ring coil station.£3–8 ea
// 09

Phase 1 — Magnetics Build

Phase 1 · Weeks 1–6
⚠ Magnetisation Warning NdFeB N45 rings and rollers at this scale carry substantial field energy. Custom magnetisation requires industrial-grade pulse magnetisers (Laboratorio Elettrofisico, Stanford Research Instruments, or similar). Do NOT attempt home magnetisation of pieces larger than ~Ø20mm — inadequate field penetration will result in weak or irregular magnetisation that is impossible to verify without MRI or scanning hall-array equipment.
1
Run FEMM Simulation Before Machining

Download FEMM (Finite Element Method Magnetics) from femm.info — free software. Model the Ring 3 cross-section first (largest, most consequential). Set up:

  • NdFeB block with Br = 1.32 T (N45), µr = 1.05, coercivity Hc = 995 kA/m
  • Copper layer with conductivity σ = 5.8×10⁷ S/m
  • Aluminium layer with σ = 3.5×10⁷ S/m
  • Air gap = 0.75mm (midpoint of 0.5–1.0mm target)
  • Vary the compound-angle pole tilt from 10° to 25° and measure tangential force on a roller element

Target: positive tangential force (self-driving torque) at the design RPM. If force is zero or negative, adjust segment count or tilt angle before ordering materials.

2
Order NdFeB Blanks (Un-magnetised)

Order rings and rollers as un-magnetised blanks in the final composite-fitted dimensions. Contact Eclipse Magnetics or Bunting with the FEMM model output as a spec sheet. Specify:

  • Grade: N45 (Br ≥ 1.32T, BHmax ≥ 342 kJ/m³)
  • Coating: Ni-Cu-Ni triple layer (corrosion protection)
  • Status: UN-magnetised (critical — shipped unmagnetised for machining)
  • Tolerance: OD/ID ±0.05mm, face flatness ≤0.01mm/100mm

Simultaneously order copper, aluminium, and nylon bar stock. Expected lead time for custom NdFeB: 4–8 weeks.

3
Machine the Aluminium and Copper Layers

Machine on a CNC lathe. Sequence (inside-out):

  1. Turn NdFeB blank OD to final dimension (external grinding with CBN wheel if needed — NdFeB machines poorly with HSS but accepts CBN/diamond)
  2. Turn copper tube to press-fit over NdFeB: interference = +0.02mm on diameter. Warm Cu tube to 80°C for assembly, slide over cold NdFeB, cool-press to seat
  3. Turn aluminium tube to press-fit over copper layer: same interference. Use 3M DP420 structural epoxy at interfaces for long-term bond security
  4. Nylon outer shell: machine to clearance fit over Al (−0.01mm, sliding fit), bond with Loctite 406 cyanoacrylate for plastics

Check concentricity with dial gauge (TIR ≤ 0.05mm) before epoxy cure.

4
Magnetise the Assembled Composites

Contact a specialist magnetisation service with your FEMM pole-pattern spec. The required pattern is a 12-segment Halbach-inspired compound-angle arrangement:

  • 12 sectors for Ring 3 (30° each), 8 for Ring 2, 4 for Ring 1
  • Within each sector, the pole axis is tilted 15–20° off the purely radial direction, toward the axial direction (compound angle)
  • Adjacent sectors have poles rotated 90° (NSEW pattern as viewed from the ring axis) — this is the Halbach rotation sequence

Magnetisation services: Laboratorio Elettrofisico (Milan, Italy) · Bunting Magnetics UK · Arnold Magnetic Technologies (US). Verify magnetisation with a scanning hall-array or MRI-style flux mapper before assembly.

5
Electret-Charge the Nylon Outer Layer

After full assembly and magnetisation, charge the nylon surface electrostatic layer:

  • Set up a corona discharge station: 20–30 kV needle electrode, 15mm gap from the nylon surface, in a dry room (RH < 30% — use silica gel desiccant if needed)
  • Rotate each ring/roller at ~1 RPM past the needle for 3–5 passes
  • Immediately measure surface potential with a static meter (Monroe Electronics 244A or similar). Target: 500V–2kV surface potential
  • Store charged components in grounded Al-foil wrapping until assembly to prevent discharge from dust/humidity
⚡ High Voltage Danger 20–30 kV corona discharge can be lethal. Use insulated gloves, face shield, one-hand-in-pocket rule, and a proper HV power supply with current-limited output (≤1 mA). Have a second person present and disconnect power before touching any component.
// 10

Phase 2 — Coil Winding

Phase 2 · Weeks 7–10
1
Prepare the Trifilar Twist

Before winding, prepare a twisted bundle of the three filars:

  • Cut AWG 18 wire (Filars A and B, blue and green) and AWG 23 wire (Filar C, orange) to 130 ft lengths each
  • Twist all three together at 6 turns per inch using a hand drill with all three ends chucked. Mark filar identities with coloured heat-shrink at each end
  • This "litzed" bundle ensures all three filars share the same flux window on every turn — critical for the Bedini trigger-coil coupling principle
2
Wind Coils on Toroid Cores

Wind each toroid station manually (shuttle winding or a home-made winding jig):

  1. Leave a 6-inch lead on all three filars at the start
  2. Wind 200 turns of the Filar A/B pair (AWG 18 ×2) and 40 turns of Filar C (AWG 23) simultaneously as the twisted bundle. They will all lay in the same groove
  3. Wind evenly, maintaining consistent tension. Overlaps are acceptable for the outer turns
  4. Leave 6-inch leads at the finish end. Mark A1/A2, B1/B2, C1/C2 with coloured cable markers
  5. Measure DC resistance: Filar A should read 2–5 Ω, Filar B 2–5 Ω, Filar C 10–20 Ω
  6. Test inductance with an LCR meter (target L ≈ 1–10 mH depending on core µi)
3
Mount Coils on the Ring Frame

Each stator ring has a non-magnetic (aluminium or G10 fibreglass) frame with coil stations spaced evenly around the circumference:

  • Ring 3: 8 stations, 45° apart
  • Ring 2: 6 stations, 60° apart
  • Ring 1: 4 stations, 90° apart

Position each coil so the core's inner bore faces the roller path, 0.5–1.0mm from the roller's nylon surface. Secure with nylon cable ties and a small dab of hot glue (non-permanent, allows adjustment). Verify alignment with a feeler gauge.

4
Route Wiring and Label All Connections

Each coil has 6 leads (A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, C2). Route them through cable management channels in the ring frame to a terminal strip at a designated wiring hub per ring. Use colour-coded PTFE-insulated hookup wire (rated ≥1kV) for all connections in the IPC flyback path.

ℹ Wire Insulation Rating The flyback path (Filar B → diode → cap → dump FET → charge battery) will see up to 800V transient. Use only wire rated ≥1kV (PTFE/Teflon insulated, e.g. Mil-Spec M22759/16 or similar). Do NOT use standard PVC hookup wire in the flyback path.
// 11

Phase 3 — IPC Circuit Build

Phase 3 · Weeks 11–14
1
Build IPC Harvesting Board (per ring station)

Build one circuit board per ring (3 boards total, each serving the coils of one ring). Use a 100×150mm fibreglass perfboard or a custom PCB (gerber files are straightforward to design in KiCad from the schematic in DWG-005).

Component placement order:

  1. Mount the MJL21194G to heatsink with thermal paste (Fischer SK68). Pre-drill heatsink mounting holes; use M3 screws with insulating bushing (transistor is NOT isolated from case)
  2. Solder 470Ω resistor and 1kΩ trimmer pot in series on the trigger line from Filar C
  3. Solder UF4007 diode in the flyback path (cathode toward charge-battery positive)
  4. Mount electrolytic caps (2× 22,000µF) with correct polarity. Use screw-terminal lugs for high-current connections
  5. Wire LM311 comparator: non-inverting input (+) to cap bank via voltage divider (set Vref = 55V for 75V caps), inverting input (−) to reference (potentiometer from Vcc), output to IRFP260N gate via 4N35 optoisolator
  6. Mount IRFP260N (dump FET) with heatsink. Drain connected to cap bank (+), source to charge-battery (+)
  7. Place NE-2 neon bulb and 1.5KE200A TVS across BJT collector-emitter as protection clamps
2
Bench Test Each Board Before Installation

Test each IPC board on the bench before installing in the SEG frame:

  • Use a small (Ø25mm, 100-turn) test coil with a Bedini-style rotor (bicycle wheel + 8 ceramic magnets) to generate trigger pulses
  • Connect Battery A (12.8V, 7Ah, LiFePO₄) as run battery; connect Battery B as receiving battery
  • With oscilloscope, verify flyback spike at collector of MJL21194G: target peak ≥100V (>200V is better)
  • Adjust the 1kΩ trigger pot until oscillation is crisp and repeatable (not intermittent, not continuous)
  • Run for 1 hour. Measure input power (WT310E) and battery B voltage rise. Verify cap-dump fires correctly (LM311 should fire IRFP260N when cap reaches setpoint)
3
Build the Swap Controller

Programme the Teensy 4.1 with the battery rotation logic:

// Simplified battery swap controller logic
// Relays: R1=A→drive, R2=B→charge, R3=C→rest
void loop() {
  if (millis() - lastSwap > SWAP_INTERVAL_MS) {
    lastSwap = millis();
    rotateBatteryRoles(); // A→C (rest), B→A (drive), C→B (charge)
    logSoC();            // read coulomb counters
    delay(500);          // relay settle time
  }
}
// SWAP_INTERVAL_MS = 300000 (5 min) to 3600000 (60 min)
// Determine optimal interval empirically per battery chemistry

Connect Omron G7L relays to Teensy digital outputs via 4N35 optoisolators. Use MBR3045 Schottky diodes on each battery terminal in blocking polarity.

// 12

Phase 4 — Mechanical Assembly

Phase 4 · Weeks 15–18
1
Build the Frame and Ring Support Structure

Fabricate a non-magnetic frame from aluminium profile (Bosch Rexroth 40×40mm T-slot extrusion) or 316 stainless steel (non-magnetic). The three stator rings mount concentrically on this frame. Design requirements:

  • Rings must be coplanar to ±0.1mm over their full diameter
  • Ring spacing (radially) must allow 0.5–1.0mm air gap to rollers
  • Roller bearing housings must allow each roller to spin freely (ceramic bearings preferred, no magnetic interference)
  • The whole assembly must be statically balanced (check with bubble level; dynamic balance after initial spin-up)
2
Mount Rings and Roller Carriages

Mount the three stator rings onto the frame. Each roller rides in a carriage that:

  • Holds the roller at the correct radial distance (0.5–1.0mm gap to ring face)
  • Allows the roller to orbit the ring (roller carriage rotates around ring axis)
  • Allows the roller to spin on its own axis (via ceramic ball bearings, ZrO₂ preferred)

Install Hall-effect sensors (SS495A) at one reference position per ring to measure roller orbital speed and provide commutation trigger for the drive ESC.

3
Install Stator Coils

Fix the pre-wound toroid coil stations onto the ring frame at their designated angular positions. Final gap check: use non-magnetic feeler gauge (plastic or brass) between each coil core and the nearest roller path. Adjust mounting until gap = 0.75±0.25mm at all stations. Secure with M3 stainless bolts and Loctite 243 thread-locker.

4
Connect IPC Boards and Battery Management

Mount the three IPC boards on the frame (non-magnetic standoffs, away from ring flux). Run ≥1kV-rated PTFE wire from each coil station's Filar B and C leads to the board. Connect boards to cap-dump bus and to the battery management swap controller. Enclose all high-voltage connections in insulated terminal blocks (Phoenix Contact or Wago) rated ≥1kV.

// 13

Phase 5 — Startup Procedure

1
Safety Pre-check
  • Confirm all IPC high-voltage paths are insulated and no exposed conductors are accessible during operation
  • Verify cap-dump bleeder resistors (10kΩ, 5W) are in place across each 22,000µF cap — these discharge caps when power is removed
  • Confirm all three batteries are at 50% SoC (not full — gives room to measure gain) and baseline-logged (terminal voltage after 1-hr rest, internal resistance)
  • Set oscilloscope on Filar C output and BJT collector. Set Yokogawa WT310E to measure Battery A input power
  • Ensure fire extinguisher (CO₂ type) is accessible. Venting batteries produce hydrogen — no open flames
2
Drive Spin-Up (BLDC Phase)

Apply 3-phase AC drive signal from VFD to Filar A of all ring coils (connected in the appropriate 3-phase configuration for the number of coil stations per ring). Start VFD at 1 Hz and ramp at 0.5 Hz/second. Watch for:

  • Rollers beginning to orbit their respective rings — first visible motion typically at 2–5 Hz
  • Current draw should rise then plateau as rollers settle into magnetic equilibrium
  • Any mechanical interference (chattering, grinding) → STOP immediately and re-check gaps
  • Target ramp-up RPM: 300–600 RPM orbital speed of rollers around Ring 3 axis
3
IPC Activation

Once rollers are orbiting at target RPM:

  1. Verify flyback pulses are present on oscilloscope (Filar B output → UF4007 → cap bank). Expected: sharp spikes at roller-pass frequency × coil-station count
  2. Verify cap voltage is rising (LM311 setpoint not yet reached during initial ramp-up)
  3. Once cap reaches comparator setpoint, verify IRFP260N fires (dump to Battery B)
  4. Adjust 1kΩ trigger pot on each board for maximum cap charge rate while maintaining stable oscillation
4
Test for Self-Spin Threshold

This is the critical Searl-effect test. At steady RPM with VFD driving:

  1. Gradually reduce VFD output power while monitoring roller RPM
  2. If the SEG self-spins (RPM holds or increases as drive is reduced), this is the Roschin-Godin threshold phenomenon
  3. If RPM drops proportionally with drive reduction (expected in a conventional motor), document the drag-torque vs RPM curve for later analysis
  4. At no point disconnect the drive abruptly — ramp down gradually to avoid transient voltage spikes
✓ What Success Looks Like True self-spin: RPM increases or holds steady as VFD power is set to zero. IPC battery B charge rate exceeds Battery A discharge rate over a 3-hour run. Anomalous cooling detected by FLIR on ring surface. Document everything with video + scope screenshots + instrument logs.
// 14

CoP Measurement Protocol

Adapted from Perry (2024) Fig. 5 methodology, extended for the SEG's combined electromechanical output.

StageActionInstrumentRecord
Pre-testCharge all 3 batteries to 50% SoC. Rest 60 min.Midtronics MDX-650V_A₀, V_B₀, V_C₀, SoC%, internal resistance of each
Stage A: Spin-upRamp VFD to target RPM. Log all energy in.WT310E on VFD outputE_spin (Wh): integral of P(t)dt from t=0 to target RPM
Stage B: Run (60 min)Operate at steady RPM. Log Battery A discharge, Battery B charge accumulation.WT310E + coulomb countersE_A_consumed (Wh), V_B(t), I_B(t), T_coil(t), RPM(t)
Stage C: RestStop. Disconnect all batteries. Rest 60 min.TimerAll batteries resting (surface charge dissipates)
Stage D: Discharge ADischarge Battery A through precision load at C/20 to 10V cutoff.WT310E + precision loadE_A_discharge (Wh)
Stage E: Discharge BDischarge Battery B through precision load at C/20 to 10V cutoff.WT310E + precision loadE_B_discharge (Wh)
CoP BatteryCoP_batt = E_B_discharge / (E_A₀ − E_A_discharge)CalculationTarget: CoP_batt > 1.0
CoP SystemCoP_sys = (E_B_discharge + E_mech_out) / (E_spin + E_A_consumed)CalculationE_mech_out from torque × angular velocity if shaft coupled to alternator
⚠ Measurement Pitfall: Surface Charge A freshly IPC-pulsed lead-acid or LiFePO₄ battery shows elevated terminal voltage that decays over 10–60 minutes. ALWAYS rest 60 minutes before discharge measurement. Skipping this rest is the most common error in IPC CoP studies and can produce apparent CoP values of 3–5× that are entirely artefactual.
// 15

Self-Loop Operations

A true self-sustaining loop — where the SEG powers itself from its own IPC output with no net battery drain — would be the strongest evidence for Searl's claims. The following protocol operationalises this test while maintaining rigorous measurement standards.

1
7-Day Continuous Run Protocol

Once the SEG is running with battery swap controller active:

  • Log all three battery terminal voltages and internal resistances after 1-hour rest each day (disconnect device, wait 1 hour, measure, reconnect)
  • Log daily: V_A, V_B, V_C, R_int_A, R_int_B, R_int_C, accumulated coulombs per battery
  • True self-sustaining operation = no net SoC decline in any battery over 7 days
  • Gradual SoC increase across all three = CoP > 1 (excess energy charging batteries overall)
  • Gradual SoC decrease = CoP < 1 (battery bank is being consumed — stop and analyse)
2
Optimise Swap Timing and Pulse Parameters

The following variables have the highest impact on measured CoP, per Perry's research:

  • Pulse repetition frequency (PRF): Determined by RPM × rollers × coil stations. Target the battery's optimal PRF. Vary RPM in 50 RPM steps and log CoP change.
  • Peak flyback voltage: Adjust via 1kΩ trigger pot on each board. Higher voltage generally improves CoP but risks BJT damage. Monitor temperature of MJL21194G with thermocouple.
  • Battery capacity: Perry found higher-capacity batteries (larger "capture cross-section") show higher CoP at similar internal resistance. If CoP is below 1, try a 30Ah battery instead of 18Ah as Battery B.
  • Swap interval: Perry's exploratory work suggested 15–30 minutes per role as a starting point for LiFePO₄. Vary from 5 to 60 minutes and log effect on net SoC trend.
// 16

Safety Requirements

⚡ Lethal Voltage Present Flyback circuits in this design routinely produce 200–800V transient spikes. Lead-acid and LiFePO₄ batteries can source thousands of amps into a short circuit. Strong NdFeB ring magnets can cause crush injuries. Rotating composite rollers at hundreds of RPM have significant kinetic energy. Read and follow all precautions below before energising the device.
HazardRiskControl
Flyback HV spike (200–800V)Electric shock, cardiac arrestAll HV paths insulated with ≥1kV-rated PTFE wire. Cap bleeder resistors always fitted. Power off and wait 60s before any physical access. Insulated gloves (Class 00, rated 500V) when working near HV nodes. One-hand-in-pocket rule when probing.
Battery short circuitFire, explosion, severe burnsAll battery connections through 40A automotive fuses. Use insulated ring terminals and silicone-covered flexible leads. No metallic jewellery when working on battery connections. CO₂ fire extinguisher within 1m of device.
NdFeB magnetic crushCrush injury, broken bonesLarge NdFeB rings (Ring 3) can exert hundreds of Newtons of attraction force to steel tools and nearby magnets. Use non-magnetic tools (Al, Cu, brass, G10 composite). Never bring two large ring magnets within 100mm of each other without a controlled jig. Store in individual wooden cases.
Rotating rollers (kinetic energy)Ejection of rollers if containment failsEnclose the ring-roller assembly in a polycarbonate containment shield (≥10mm, rated for roller ejection). Never stand directly in the plane of the rings during high-RPM operation. Use remote operation (camera + monitor) above 300 RPM.
Battery off-gassing (H₂)Explosion if ignitedOperate in well-ventilated space. No open flames or sparks within 1m of batteries. LiFePO₄ preferred (lower off-gassing than lead-acid). If lead-acid used, mandatory forced-air ventilation.
Corona discharge (20–30kV)Cardiac arrest from even micro-amp currents at lethal voltageElectret charging step (Phase 1 Step 5) to be performed only by one trained person with a second trained observer present. HV supply must be current-limited to ≤1mA. Insulated gloves rated Class E (30kV) required. HV supply has a physical key that is held by the operator at all times.
RF/EMI from flyback pulsesInterference with pacemakers, medical devicesAnyone with a cardiac pacemaker or implanted medical device must stay ≥5m from the operating device. Shield IPC boards with grounded aluminium enclosures.
ℹ Research Integrity Note Document every run with date/time, all instrument readings, photographs, and video. Store raw data in an open, timestamped repository (e.g. OSF.io, following Perry's own methodology). Negative results are as valuable as positive ones — the scientific goal is to definitively characterise this device, not to confirm a desired outcome. Share your findings publicly regardless of result.
// 17

Credits & Acknowledgements

This build manual draws on decades of work by independent researchers, engineers, and physicists operating largely outside mainstream funding structures. Their contributions — whether ultimately vindicated or not by experiment — form the intellectual foundation of this project. The following individuals and organisations deserve explicit credit.

17.1 Primary Inventors & Researchers
NameContributionPeriodNotes
John Roy Robert Searl
(1932–2018)
Inventor of the SEG concept; documented the ring-roller layered composite design, segmented pole magnetisation, and claimed self-sustaining electromagnetic effect 1946 – 2018 Searl reported first observing anomalous motor behaviour at age 14 while working as an apprentice electrician. His claims were never independently replicated to peer-reviewed standard during his lifetime, but he maintained and developed his theory consistently over seven decades. His published work and interviews remain the primary source for the SEG's material specifications.
Julian Perry
Kerrow Energetics, UK
IPC research, CoP > 1 documentation, open-science methodology, battery electrochemistry analysis, Perry (2024) and Perry (2025) published studies 2018 – present Perry's rigorous application of the Open Science Framework to IPC experiments — with pre-registration, public data, and uncertainty quantification — represents the most methodologically sound work in this field. His "Inductive Pulse Charging: What, How & Why?" paper is the direct theoretical source for the IPC integration in this manual.
John C. Bedini
(1945–2016)
Monopole energiser / SG circuit topology; bifilar coil methodology; NDR transistor selection for flyback harvesting; rotor-based pulse generation; TeslagenX battery chargers 1984 – 2016 Bedini's "Simplified School Girl" (SSG) circuit — released publicly in 2001 — became the reference design from which the IPC community developed. His identification of the MJL21194G transistor's NDR behaviour and his bifilar winding protocol are directly embedded in this build. Patents: US6,545,444 (2003) and US7,109,671 (2006).
Robert G. Adams
(1920–2010), New Zealand
Adams Pulse Motor; magnetic reluctance motor design principles; flyback pulse recovery; low-supply-current motor topology; coil gauge and turns-ratio methodology 1969 – 2010 Adams, as Chairman of the NZ Institute of Electrical Engineers, brought engineering rigour to pulse-motor design. His joint patent with Harold Aspden (GB2282708A, 1993) documents the wire-gauge, magnet-strength, and coil-geometry principles adopted in Section 11 of this manual.
Harold Aspden
(1927–2011), UK
Theoretical framework for anomalous energy in electromagnetic systems; IBM Director of European Patents; joint inventor with Adams; aether physics models 1957 – 2011 Aspden's background in patent law and theoretical physics gave the Adams motor its most rigorous documentation. His theoretical contributions — while outside mainstream physics — provide a structured explanatory framework for the pulse-motor community's observations.
Nikola Tesla
(1856–1943)
Unidirectional pulse methodology ("Method of Conversion"); bifilar coil patent (US512,340, 1894); observations on "electro-radiant events"; longitudinal wave theory; single-wire power transmission 1880s – 1920s Tesla's 1893 lecture "On Light and Other High Frequency Phenomena" is the intellectual origin of the IPC lineage. His description of pulsed DC as qualitatively different from AC — capable of effects not predicted by Hertzian electromagnetic theory — remains the theoretical touchstone for this entire field.
Daniel M. Cook First documented anomalous energy gains from uni-directional inductive pulses; Cook (1871) patent — the earliest known prior art for IPC 1871 Cook's US Patent 119,825A ("Improvements in Induction Coils", 1871) is the earliest documented observation of anomalous energy behaviour in inductive pulse circuits, predating Tesla's work by a decade. Perry identifies this as the origin point of the IPC lineage.
Gabriel Kron
(1901–1968)
Negative resistor development at GE/Stanford; open-path circuit theory; Kron (1945) — lamellar currents and second rectangular transformation matrix 1930s – 1960s As chief scientist on the US Navy Network Analyzer project at Stanford, Kron developed practical negative resistors and, according to colleagues, could disconnect a generator because the negative resistor would power the circuit via "open paths". His theoretical work provides one of the more technically grounded frameworks for CoP > 1 claims.
Thomas E. Bearden
(1930–2022)
Heaviside non-divergent energy component theory; MEG (Motionless Electromagnetic Generator); source charge problem resolution; vacuum energy extraction framework 1970s – 2020s Bearden's "Energy from the Vacuum: Concepts & Principles" (2004) is the most systematic attempt to provide a theoretical foundation for over-unity electromagnetic devices. While not accepted by mainstream physics, his framework — particularly the Heaviside energy component and dipole asymmetry arguments — is extensively cited in the IPC literature and informs the theoretical discussion in Section 8 of this manual.
Vladimir Roschin & Serge Godin
Russian Academy of Sciences
MEC (Magnetic Energy Converter) — closest documented replication of SEG-type device; reported 7 kW output, self-spin above 550 RPM, magnetic wall structures, and anomalous cooling Late 1990s Roschin and Godin's replication attempt — conducted within a credentialled institution using calibrated instruments — remains the most significant attempted verification of Searl-type claims. Their reported observations (weight reduction, anomalous temperature gradients, magnetic wall structures at specific radii) have not been independently reproduced. The original prototype was reportedly stolen.
Peter Lindemann & Aaron Murakami Bedini SG documentation and publication; "Bedini SG: The Complete Beginner's and Intermediate Handbooks"; battery swap methodology; split-the-positive topology; A&P Electronic Media 2010s – present Lindemann and Murakami performed the essential work of systematising and publishing Bedini's circuit knowledge in reproducible form. Their handbooks are the primary practical reference for the IPC harvesting circuit design in Sections 11 and 15 of this manual.
Eric P. Dollard Longitudinal Magneto-Dielectric (LMD) wave theory; replication of Tesla experiments; scalar wave documentation; "Transverse & Longitudinal Electric Waves" (1988) 1980s – present Dollard's experimental replication of Tesla's single-wire power transmission and his theoretical framework distinguishing "transference" from "displacement" provide the conceptual basis for the scalar/LMD wave discussion in this manual. His work through Borderland Sciences Research Foundation is the most technically rigorous in this lineage.
Ilya Prigogine
(1917–2003)
Dissipative structures theory; non-equilibrium thermodynamics; Nobel Prize in Chemistry (1977); theoretical basis for Type B energetic reactions and far-from-equilibrium systems 1960s – 2003 Prigogine's Nobel Prize-winning work on dissipative structures provides the only fully mainstream-accepted theoretical framework that could, in principle, accommodate over-unity Coefficient of Performance in open thermodynamic systems. His work is the scientific foundation for Perry's open thermodynamics argument.
17.2 How to Credit This Work

If you replicate, extend, or publish results based on this build manual, please credit the primary sources above and use the following attribution for the integrated SEG-IPC design synthesis:

// Suggested citation for this manual:
SEG-IPC Integrated Generator Build Manual (2026).
Synthesised from: Searl (1946–2018), Perry (2024–2025),
Bedini (1984–2016), Adams & Aspden (GB2282708A, 1993).
Available: [your repository URL]
Licence: CC BY 4.0 — share freely with attribution.

For any published paper arising from experiments with this device, the following references should be cited in full (see Section 18). At minimum, cite Perry (2024), Bedini (US6,545,444), and Roschin & Godin (2000) as the closest prior experimental art.

17.3 Open Science Commitment
✓ Register Your Experiment Before You Run It Following Perry's methodology, pre-register your experimental protocol on the Open Science Framework (osf.io) before collecting any data. This timestamps your methodology and prevents hindsight bias. Make your raw data, instrument logs, and analysis scripts publicly available. The field advances only through shared, reproducible results — positive or negative.
// 18

References & Bibliography

References are grouped by category. All URLs verified at time of compilation. DOI links are permanent; web URLs may change.

18.1 IPC & Inductive Pulse Charging — Primary Sources
ReferenceTypeRelevance to this build
Perry, J. (2024). Inductive Pulse Charging with Electrochemical Systems — Key Findings of the 1st OSF Study. Journal of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, 3(4), 01–15. Kerrow Energetics, UK. Peer-reviewed journal article Primary source for all IPC CoP measurements, methodology (Fig. 5 protocol), battery type comparisons, and NDR transistor selection. OSF pre-registration: osf.io/ZTFUB
Perry, J. (2025). Inductive Pulse Charging with Electrochemical Systems — 2nd OSF Study Results. Journal of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, 4(5), 01–14. Kerrow Energetics, UK. Peer-reviewed journal article Follow-on study; documents LiFePO4 CoP up to ~38, solid-state vs rotor-based switching comparison, and cap-dump optimisation.
Perry, J. (2023). Inductive Pulse Charging: What, How & Why? Kerrow Energetics, UK. [Conference paper / preprint] Preprint / conference paper Foundational overview paper — directly reproduced in the uploaded research documents for this project. Source for IPC history, open thermodynamics framing, Heaviside component theory, and measurement methodology.
Cook, D.M. (1871). Improvements in Induction Coils. US Patent 119,825A. US Patent and Trademark Office. patents.google.com Patent (1871) Earliest documented observation of anomalous energy gains in uni-directional inductive pulse circuits. First prior art for IPC.
Tesla, N. (1893). On Light and Other High Frequency Phenomena. Nature, 48, 136–140. doi:10.1038/048136b0 Published lecture Tesla's description of pulsed DC as qualitatively distinct from AC; the intellectual origin of the IPC lineage. Documents "electro-radiant" phenomena observed with sharp unidirectional pulses.
Tesla, N. (1894). Coil for Electro-Magnets. US Patent 512,340. patents.google.com Patent The bifilar flat coil patent. Foundation for the trifilar winding approach in Section 10 of this manual.
Bedini, J.C. (2003). Device and Method for Pulse Charging a Battery and for Driving Other Devices with a Pulse. US Patent 6,545,444. Patent The cap-dump circuit patent. Covers the comparator-triggered capacitor discharge topology used in Section 11 of this manual.
Bedini, J.C. (2006). Permanent Magnetic Motor-Generator. US Patent 7,109,671. Patent Bedini's rotor-based pulse motor generator patent. Documents the trigger-coil and power-coil separation principle used in the SEG coil winding design.
Lindemann, P. & Murakami, A. (2013). Bedini SG: The Complete Intermediate Handbook. A&P Electronic Media. emediapress.com Technical handbook Reference for coil winding specification, MJL21194G transistor selection, battery swap protocol, and cap-dump circuit details. Section 15 (self-loop methodology) draws directly from this work.
Amanor-Boadu, J.M. (2018). The Impact of Pulse Charging Parameters on the Life Cycle of Lithium-Ion Polymer Batteries. Energies, 11(8), 2162. doi:10.3390/en11082162 Peer-reviewed journal article Mainstream peer-reviewed evidence that pulse charging improves battery cycle life vs constant-current charging. Supports the IPC approach from a conventional battery science perspective.
Cooper, R.B. (2002). Pulse Charging Lead-Acid Batteries to Improve Performance and Reverse the Effects of Sulfation. MSc thesis, West Virginia University. WVU Repository MSc thesis Peer-reviewed evidence for pulse charging effects on lead-acid battery sulphation. Supports the electrochemical mechanism hypothesis for IPC energy gains.
18.2 SEG & Related Electromagnetic Devices
ReferenceTypeRelevance
Roschin, V.V. & Godin, S.M. (2000). An Experimental Investigation of the Physical Effects in a Dynamic Magnetic System of the Searl Type. New Energy Technologies, 1(1). Russian Academy of Sciences. Experimental report The most significant documented replication attempt of SEG-type behaviour. Reports self-spin above 550 RPM, 7 kW output, weight reduction of ~35%, anomalous cooling, and magnetic wall structures at specific radii. Not independently reproduced.
Adams, R.G. & Aspden, H. (1993). Electrical Motor-Generator. UK Patent GB2282708A. patents.google.com Patent The Adams-Aspden motor-generator patent. Source for coil wire gauge, magnet strength selection, supply current minimisation, and commutation timing principles in Section 11.
Bearden, T.E. (2004). Energy from the Vacuum: Concepts & Principles. Cheniere Press. ISBN: 0972514945. Book Systematic theoretical framework for electromagnetic over-unity devices. Source for Heaviside non-divergent energy component, source charge problem, and dipole asymmetry arguments in Section 8.
Barrett, T.W. (2008). Topological Foundations of Electromagnetism. World Scientific Series in Contemporary Chemical Physics, Vol. 26. doi:10.1142/6693 Academic monograph Peer-reviewed academic treatment of electromagnetic phenomena outside the Maxwell-Heaviside framework. Lists EM phenomena not explained by standard Maxwell equations.
Anastasovski, P.K. et al. (2000). [O(3) Electrodynamics]. Physica Scripta, 61, 513. doi:10.1238/Physica.Regular.061a00513 Peer-reviewed journal article Peer-reviewed treatment of extended electrodynamics including magnetic charge and current density terms excluded from standard Maxwell-Heaviside equations. Supports the theoretical framework for anomalous IPC effects.
Gray, E. (1985). Efficient Electrical Conversion Switching Tube Suitable for Inductive Loads. US Patent 4,661,747. patents.google.com Patent Edwin Gray's switching tube patent. Historical precedent for cold-electricity / NDR switching devices. Informed Bedini's transistor selection methodology.
Moddel, G., Weerakkody, A., Doroski, D. & Bartusiak, D. (2021). Casimir-Cavity-Induced Conductance Changes. Physical Review Research, 3, L022007. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L022007 Peer-reviewed journal article Mainstream peer-reviewed evidence for coupling between the Zero Point Field and regular matter at boundary conditions. Supports Perry's Type B energetic reaction framework.
Hotta, M. (2013). Ground-State-Entanglement Bound for Quantum Energy Teleportation of General Spin-Chain Models. Physical Review A, 87, 032313. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.87.032313 Peer-reviewed journal article Theoretical basis for "quantum energy teleportation" — negative energy states and energy transfer between entangled particles. Tested on IBM quantum computers; relevant to vacuum energy accessibility arguments.
18.3 Thermodynamics & Open Systems
ReferenceTypeRelevance
Prigogine, I. (1975). Dissipative Structures, Dynamics and Entropy. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 9(S9), 443–456. doi:10.1002/qua.560090854 Peer-reviewed journal article Nobel Prize-winning foundational paper on dissipative structures. The only fully mainstream scientific framework that accommodates locally negentropic energy organisation in open systems — the theoretical basis for CoP > 1 in IPC open thermodynamic systems.
Sheehan, D. (2022). Beyond the Thermodynamic Limit: Template for Second Law Violators. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 36(3), 473–483. doi:10.31275/20222593 Peer-reviewed journal article Documents experimental cases where the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics has been locally violated or circumvented. Provides theoretical grounding for Type B energy reactions.
Lee, J.W. (2022). Type-B Energetic Processes and Their Associated Scientific Implications. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 36(3), 487–495. doi:10.31275/20222517 Peer-reviewed journal article Defines the Type A / Type B energetic reaction distinction. Type B reactions — characterised by asymmetric boundary conditions and non-strict adherence to the 2nd Law — are the theoretical basis for anomalous IPC effects.
Jaeger, H.M. & Liu, A.J. (2010). Far-From-Equilibrium Physics: An Overview. Condensed Matter and Material Physics decadal study report. arXiv:1009.4874 Review article (mainstream) Mainstream review of far-from-equilibrium physics. Establishes the scientific context for boundary-condition energy dynamics relevant to the SEG multi-layer composite interfaces.
Ackerman, M.L. et al. (2016). Anomalous Dynamical Behaviour of Freestanding Graphene Membranes. Physical Review Letters, 117, 126801. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.126801 Peer-reviewed journal article Mainstream PRL paper documenting anomalous thermodynamic behaviour at material boundaries. Supports Perry's argument that boundary conditions are sites of freely accessible energy.
18.4 Magnetics, Materials & Engineering
ReferenceTypeRelevance
Choi, Y.S. et al. (2020). Nylon-11 Nanowires for Triboelectric Energy Harvesting. EcoMat, 2(1). doi:10.1002/eom2.12063 Peer-reviewed journal article Mainstream evidence for triboelectric energy harvesting from Nylon-11, directly relevant to the electret charging of the SEG nylon outer shell in Phase 1 Step 5.
Halbach, K. (1980). Design of Permanent Multipole Magnets with Oriented Rare Earth Cobalt Material. Nuclear Instruments and Methods, 169(1), 1–10. doi:10.1016/0029-554X(80)90094-4 Peer-reviewed journal article Original Halbach array paper. The pole-rotation sequence and one-sided flux concentration principle applied to the SEG segmented magnetisation design derives from this work.
Schmidt-Rohr, K. (2018). How Batteries Store and Release Energy: Explaining Basic Electrochemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 95, 1801–1810. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00479 Peer-reviewed journal article Source for battery electrochemistry fundamentals — Gibbs free energy, Nernst equation, and the distinction between terminal voltage and internal energy state. Informs the CoP measurement protocol in Section 14.
Braun, J. et al. (2022). State of Charge and State of Health Diagnosis of Batteries with Voltage-Controlled Models. Journal of Power Sources, 544, 231828. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231828 Peer-reviewed journal article Battery SoC and SoH methodology. Informs the battery health monitoring and Midtronics conductance testing protocol in the CoP measurement section.
Lee, T.D. & Yang, C.N. (1956). Question of Parity Conservation in Weak Interactions. Physical Review, 104, 254. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.104.254 Peer-reviewed journal article (Nobel Prize) Nobel Prize-winning paper on symmetry breaking phenomena. Cited in the IPC literature (Perry, Bearden) as confirmation that broken symmetry — the physical basis for the IPC source-charge / dipole asymmetry argument — is a mainstream-accepted physical phenomenon.
Morée, G. (2022). Comparison of Poynting's Vector and the Power Flow Used in Electrical Engineering. AIP Advances, 12, 085219. doi:10.1063/5.0101339 Peer-reviewed journal article Mainstream treatment of the Poynting vector and energy flow around conductors — relevant to the Heaviside non-divergent energy component discussion in Section 8.
18.5 Further Reading & Online Resources
ResourceURLContent
Kerrow Energeticskerrowenergetics.org.ukPerry's IPC research hub. Full OSF study data, patent list, and preprints.
Open Science Framework — IPC Studyosf.io/ZTFUBPre-registered IPC study with timestamped protocol, raw data, and results.
FEMM (Finite Element Method Magnetics)femm.infoFree 2D magnetics FEA software. Run the Lua scripts supplied with this build.
OpenSCADopenscad.orgFree parametric CAD. Open the .scad files supplied with this build.
A&P Electronic Media (Bedini SG)emediapress.comLindemann and Murakami handbooks; Bedini SG intermediate and advanced guides.
Energy Science Forumenergyscienceforum.comCommunity forum for IPC / pulse motor replicators. Transistor comparisons, circuit variants, results sharing.
Eric Dollard — EPD Laboratoriesericpdollard.comDollard's LMD wave papers, Tesla experiment replications, and wireless power transmission work.
SEARL Magneticssearlmagnetics.comOfficial continuation of Searl's work post-2018. Material specifications and magnetisation guidance.
JLCPCB (PCB fabrication)jlcpcb.comUpload the Gerber files in this package. Select 2oz copper, FR4 1.6mm, HASL or ENIG.
KiCad Gerber Viewerkicad.orgFree PCB design suite. Use GerbView to verify the Gerber files before ordering.
ℹ A Note on Contested Sources This reference list deliberately includes both mainstream peer-reviewed publications (Prigogine, Lee & Yang, Moddel, Ackerman, Halbach) and non-mainstream works (Bearden, Dollard, Bedini, Searl). The former provide the scientific grounding; the latter provide the design specifics without which this device cannot be built. Both categories are cited with full bibliographic detail so readers can assess each source independently. The presence of a reference here does not constitute an endorsement of all claims made in that source.