+ IPC Integration
Introduction & Scope
This manual integrates two research lineages: John Searl's Searl Effect Generator (SEG) — a layered NdFeB/copper/aluminium/nylon ring-and-roller electromagnetic device claimed to produce self-sustaining electrical output — and Julian Perry's Inductive Pulse Charging (IPC) framework, which documents anomalous Coefficient of Performance (>1) in lead-acid and LiFePO₄ batteries charged by flyback pulses from collapsing magnetic fields.
The integration thesis is straightforward: the SEG's mechanical roller-on-ring architecture is a natural analogue of the Bedini SG pulse motor. Each roller pass generates a sharp dΦ/dt in the stator coils, collapses the field, and produces a flyback spike. If that spike is routed through an MJL21194G-class BJT in its negative-differential-resistance (NDR) avalanche region and harvested into a LiFePO₄ battery, the IPC literature suggests a measurable CoP advantage that — if combined with the SEG's claimed self-spin — could push toward energetic self-sufficiency.
Operating Principles
The SEG consists of three concentric stator rings, each carrying a set of cylindrical rollers. Both rings and rollers are manufactured as four-layer composites: an innermost NdFeB magnetic core, copper layer, aluminium layer, and outer nylon shell. The rollers are magnetised in a compound segmented pattern (~15–20° off radial, Halbach-inspired) that produces a travelling magnetic wave as they orbit the ring, providing self-driving torque once a threshold speed is reached — analogous to a linear induction motor operating in reverse.
The stator rings carry toroidal pickup coils. As each roller passes, it induces a sharp dΦ/dt in the coil, producing an EMF pulse. The copper and aluminium layers in both rings and rollers contribute eddy-current coupling that modifies the pulse waveform. The nylon outer layer accumulates triboelectric/electret charge, adding an electrostatic component to the induced pulse.
When the roller departs a stator coil region, the collapsing magnetic field induces a reverse-EMF spike (Lenz's Law) that can reach 10–100× the supply voltage. This "flyback" pulse, routed through an MJL21194G NPN transistor operating in its negative-differential-resistance (NDR) avalanche region, produces a qualitatively distinct waveform — characterised by very short rise time (<100 ns), extremely high peak voltage (200–800 V), and a specific displacement-current component that the IPC literature associates with anomalous battery charging behaviour.
Perry's research documents that the energy gains are realised inside the battery — in the electrochemical environment — not in the pulse circuit itself. The circuit's conventional efficiency is only 15–30%, but the gains at the battery can more than offset this.
System Overview Drawing
The following drawing shows the complete SEG-IPC integrated system: mechanical section (top), IPC harvesting circuit (middle), and self-loop battery management (bottom).
Ring Cross-Sections
The following drawing shows a dimensioned cross-section through Ring 3 (outermost) and a detail of the four-layer composite construction. All three rings follow identical layer proportions scaled to their respective diameters.
Roller Detail Drawing
Coil Winding Detail
IPC Circuit Schematic
Self-Loop Topology
Procurement List
The following tables list all components required for one complete SEG-IPC integrated generator. Components are grouped by subsystem. Manufacturer and supplier suggestions are included; alternatives exist in most categories.
| Item | Spec / Part No. | Qty | Est. Cost | Supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NdFeB Ring blanks (Ring 1) | Ø110×80×25mm, N45, un-magnetised | 2 (spare) | £120–200 ea | Eclipse Magnetics / Bunting |
| NdFeB Ring blanks (Ring 2) | Ø260×220×35mm, N45, un-magnetised | 2 (spare) | £400–800 ea | Eclipse Magnetics / Bunting |
| NdFeB Ring blanks (Ring 3) | Ø460×400×50mm, N45, un-magnetised | 2 (spare) | £1200–2000 ea | Eclipse Magnetics / Bunting |
| NdFeB Roller blanks (Ring 1) | Ø5mm core × 25mm, N45, un-magnetised | 8 (spares) | £20–40 ea | Supermagnete / K&J |
| NdFeB Roller blanks (Ring 2) | Ø8mm core × 35mm, N45, un-magnetised | 12 (spares) | £40–80 ea | Supermagnete / K&J |
| NdFeB Roller blanks (Ring 3) | Ø10mm core × 50mm, N45, un-magnetised | 18 (spares) | £80–150 ea | Supermagnete / K&J |
| Cu C110 ETP bar | Ø50mm round bar, 1m length | 3m total | £80–120/m | Metals4U / Online Metals |
| Al 6061-T6 bar | Ø60mm round bar, 1m length | 3m total | £30–50/m | Metals4U / Aluminium Warehouse |
| Nylon-12 rod | Ø55mm PA12, 1m length | 2m total | £40–70/m | Ensinger / ePlastics |
| Structural epoxy | 3M DP420 Scotch-Weld 50ml | 5 cartridges | £30–50 ea | 3M / RS Components |
| Item | Part No. / Spec | Qty (for 3 ring-stations) | Est. Cost | Supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MJL21194G BJT | ON Semi, TO-264 | 9 (3/station + spares) | £3–6 ea | Mouser / Digi-Key |
| UF4007 ultrafast diode | 1000V, 75ns, DO-41 | 50 (many spares) | £0.10–0.30 ea | LCSC / Mouser / RS |
| MUR1560 diode (alt, higher I) | 600V, 15A, TO-220AC | 10 | £0.80–2 ea | Mouser / Digi-Key |
| 22,000µF / 75V electrolytic | Nichicon LGJ series, 105°C | 6 (2/stage) | £8–20 ea | Mouser / RS Components |
| IRFP260N MOSFET | 200V, 50A, TO-247 | 6 | £3–6 ea | Mouser / Digi-Key |
| LM311 comparator | DIP-8 | 9 | £0.40–1 ea | Mouser / RS / LCSC |
| NE-2 neon bulb | T-1¾, 90V, 0.3mA | 12 | £0.20–0.50 ea | Mouser / Farnell / eBay |
| 1kΩ trimmer pot | Bourns 3296W-1-102LF | 9 | £0.80–2 ea | Mouser / RS Components |
| 470Ω 1W resistor | Metal film, ±1% | 18 | £0.10–0.30 ea | Any / Mouser / LCSC |
| 4N35 optoisolator | DIP-6, CTR≥100% | 9 | £0.20–0.50 ea | Mouser / RS / LCSC |
| TVS diode 1.5KE200A | Unidirectional, 200V clamp | 9 | £0.50–1 ea | Mouser / Digi-Key |
| Heatsink TO-264/TO-247 | Fischer SK68/25.4 or equiv. | 6 | £2–5 ea | RS Components / Farnell |
| Ferrite toroid T200-52 | Amidon, OD=51mm, µi=75 | 18 (+spares) | £3–8 ea | Kits and Parts / Mouser |
| AWG 18 magnet wire | Enamelled Cu, 200°C, 1 lb spool | 36 lb total (18 spools) | £12–20/lb | Remington Ind. / MWS Wire |
| AWG 23 magnet wire | Enamelled Cu, 200°C | 3 lb total | £12–20/lb | Remington Ind. / MWS Wire |
| Prototype PCB / Perfboard | 100×150mm fibreglass | 6 boards | £1–3 ea | LCSC / AliExpress / RS |
| Item | Spec | Qty | Est. Cost | Supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LiFePO₄ 12.8V 18Ah battery | Grade A cells, BMS built-in, M6 terminals | 3 (A, B, C) | £80–150 ea | CATL / Eve / Poweroad / Amazon |
| Battery charger LiFePO₄ | 14.6V CC/CV, 5A, for initial charging | 1 | £20–50 | Victron / NOCO / any branded |
| Omron G7L-1A-T DPDT relay | 30A, 250VAC coil 12V, swap controller | 6 | £8–15 ea | RS Components / Mouser |
| MBR3045 Schottky blocking diode | 45V, 30A, TO-220 | 12 | £1–3 ea | Mouser / Digi-Key |
| Teensy 4.1 microcontroller | ARM M7 600MHz, battery swap timer | 1 | £25–35 | PJRC / Mouser / Digi-Key |
| Coulomb counter module | 100A shunt, I²C output, e.g. Adafruit 4226 | 3 | £10–20 ea | Adafruit / Mouser |
| Midtronics MDX-650 conductance tester | Battery health + SoC measurement | 1 | £150–300 | Midtronics / Battery Tools Direct |
| Instrument | Model / Spec | Purpose | Est. Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power analyser | Yokogawa WT310E or WT330 | True RMS input/output power accounting. Essential for CoP calculation. Do not substitute with basic meters — they miss sub-µs spikes. | £1500–4000 |
| Oscilloscope | Tektronix TBS2204B (200 MHz, 4-ch) | Waveform capture of flyback pulses. Must be ≥200 MHz for accurate ns-rise-time measurement. 4-channel needed for simultaneous trigger/drive/pickup/battery monitoring. | £900–1500 |
| Rogowski coil (current probe) | PEM CWT015 or CWT030 | High-bandwidth (30 MHz) current measurement without ground-loop issues. Needed for measuring fast flyback current spikes — clamp meters are inadequate. | £200–500 ea (×2) |
| Gaussmeter | AlphaLab GM2, 3-axis, 20kG range | Map ring and roller flux density; monitor field changes during operation. | £200–400 |
| Thermal camera | FLIR E6 Pro or Seek Thermal | Monitor ring/coil temperature anomalies. Searl claimed anomalous cooling — this would be clearly visible. Also detects overheating components. | £400–900 |
| Precision resistive load | Vishay LPS series, 1Ω–100Ω, 5W–50W | Known load for battery discharge measurements in CoP protocol. Must be non-inductive wirewound or metal-film — no carbon resistors. | £20–80 ea |
| Variable freq. drive (VFD) | Huanyang HY-ND 3-phase, 0.5–2.2kW | Startup drive for ring coils (BLDC phase-shifted AC). 3-phase output from single-phase input. Variable frequency 1–400 Hz for ramp-up. | £80–200 |
| Hall effect sensors | Honeywell SS495A (linear) or SS400 (digital) | Roller position sensing for commutation timing and RPM measurement. One per ring coil station. | £3–8 ea |
Phase 1 — Magnetics Build
Download FEMM (Finite Element Method Magnetics) from femm.info — free software. Model the Ring 3 cross-section first (largest, most consequential). Set up:
- NdFeB block with Br = 1.32 T (N45), µr = 1.05, coercivity Hc = 995 kA/m
- Copper layer with conductivity σ = 5.8×10⁷ S/m
- Aluminium layer with σ = 3.5×10⁷ S/m
- Air gap = 0.75mm (midpoint of 0.5–1.0mm target)
- Vary the compound-angle pole tilt from 10° to 25° and measure tangential force on a roller element
Target: positive tangential force (self-driving torque) at the design RPM. If force is zero or negative, adjust segment count or tilt angle before ordering materials.
Order rings and rollers as un-magnetised blanks in the final composite-fitted dimensions. Contact Eclipse Magnetics or Bunting with the FEMM model output as a spec sheet. Specify:
- Grade: N45 (Br ≥ 1.32T, BHmax ≥ 342 kJ/m³)
- Coating: Ni-Cu-Ni triple layer (corrosion protection)
- Status: UN-magnetised (critical — shipped unmagnetised for machining)
- Tolerance: OD/ID ±0.05mm, face flatness ≤0.01mm/100mm
Simultaneously order copper, aluminium, and nylon bar stock. Expected lead time for custom NdFeB: 4–8 weeks.
Machine on a CNC lathe. Sequence (inside-out):
- Turn NdFeB blank OD to final dimension (external grinding with CBN wheel if needed — NdFeB machines poorly with HSS but accepts CBN/diamond)
- Turn copper tube to press-fit over NdFeB: interference = +0.02mm on diameter. Warm Cu tube to 80°C for assembly, slide over cold NdFeB, cool-press to seat
- Turn aluminium tube to press-fit over copper layer: same interference. Use 3M DP420 structural epoxy at interfaces for long-term bond security
- Nylon outer shell: machine to clearance fit over Al (−0.01mm, sliding fit), bond with Loctite 406 cyanoacrylate for plastics
Check concentricity with dial gauge (TIR ≤ 0.05mm) before epoxy cure.
Contact a specialist magnetisation service with your FEMM pole-pattern spec. The required pattern is a 12-segment Halbach-inspired compound-angle arrangement:
- 12 sectors for Ring 3 (30° each), 8 for Ring 2, 4 for Ring 1
- Within each sector, the pole axis is tilted 15–20° off the purely radial direction, toward the axial direction (compound angle)
- Adjacent sectors have poles rotated 90° (NSEW pattern as viewed from the ring axis) — this is the Halbach rotation sequence
Magnetisation services: Laboratorio Elettrofisico (Milan, Italy) · Bunting Magnetics UK · Arnold Magnetic Technologies (US). Verify magnetisation with a scanning hall-array or MRI-style flux mapper before assembly.
After full assembly and magnetisation, charge the nylon surface electrostatic layer:
- Set up a corona discharge station: 20–30 kV needle electrode, 15mm gap from the nylon surface, in a dry room (RH < 30% — use silica gel desiccant if needed)
- Rotate each ring/roller at ~1 RPM past the needle for 3–5 passes
- Immediately measure surface potential with a static meter (Monroe Electronics 244A or similar). Target: 500V–2kV surface potential
- Store charged components in grounded Al-foil wrapping until assembly to prevent discharge from dust/humidity
Phase 2 — Coil Winding
Before winding, prepare a twisted bundle of the three filars:
- Cut AWG 18 wire (Filars A and B, blue and green) and AWG 23 wire (Filar C, orange) to 130 ft lengths each
- Twist all three together at 6 turns per inch using a hand drill with all three ends chucked. Mark filar identities with coloured heat-shrink at each end
- This "litzed" bundle ensures all three filars share the same flux window on every turn — critical for the Bedini trigger-coil coupling principle
Wind each toroid station manually (shuttle winding or a home-made winding jig):
- Leave a 6-inch lead on all three filars at the start
- Wind 200 turns of the Filar A/B pair (AWG 18 ×2) and 40 turns of Filar C (AWG 23) simultaneously as the twisted bundle. They will all lay in the same groove
- Wind evenly, maintaining consistent tension. Overlaps are acceptable for the outer turns
- Leave 6-inch leads at the finish end. Mark A1/A2, B1/B2, C1/C2 with coloured cable markers
- Measure DC resistance: Filar A should read 2–5 Ω, Filar B 2–5 Ω, Filar C 10–20 Ω
- Test inductance with an LCR meter (target L ≈ 1–10 mH depending on core µi)
Each stator ring has a non-magnetic (aluminium or G10 fibreglass) frame with coil stations spaced evenly around the circumference:
- Ring 3: 8 stations, 45° apart
- Ring 2: 6 stations, 60° apart
- Ring 1: 4 stations, 90° apart
Position each coil so the core's inner bore faces the roller path, 0.5–1.0mm from the roller's nylon surface. Secure with nylon cable ties and a small dab of hot glue (non-permanent, allows adjustment). Verify alignment with a feeler gauge.
Each coil has 6 leads (A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, C2). Route them through cable management channels in the ring frame to a terminal strip at a designated wiring hub per ring. Use colour-coded PTFE-insulated hookup wire (rated ≥1kV) for all connections in the IPC flyback path.
Phase 3 — IPC Circuit Build
Build one circuit board per ring (3 boards total, each serving the coils of one ring). Use a 100×150mm fibreglass perfboard or a custom PCB (gerber files are straightforward to design in KiCad from the schematic in DWG-005).
Component placement order:
- Mount the MJL21194G to heatsink with thermal paste (Fischer SK68). Pre-drill heatsink mounting holes; use M3 screws with insulating bushing (transistor is NOT isolated from case)
- Solder 470Ω resistor and 1kΩ trimmer pot in series on the trigger line from Filar C
- Solder UF4007 diode in the flyback path (cathode toward charge-battery positive)
- Mount electrolytic caps (2× 22,000µF) with correct polarity. Use screw-terminal lugs for high-current connections
- Wire LM311 comparator: non-inverting input (+) to cap bank via voltage divider (set Vref = 55V for 75V caps), inverting input (−) to reference (potentiometer from Vcc), output to IRFP260N gate via 4N35 optoisolator
- Mount IRFP260N (dump FET) with heatsink. Drain connected to cap bank (+), source to charge-battery (+)
- Place NE-2 neon bulb and 1.5KE200A TVS across BJT collector-emitter as protection clamps
Test each IPC board on the bench before installing in the SEG frame:
- Use a small (Ø25mm, 100-turn) test coil with a Bedini-style rotor (bicycle wheel + 8 ceramic magnets) to generate trigger pulses
- Connect Battery A (12.8V, 7Ah, LiFePO₄) as run battery; connect Battery B as receiving battery
- With oscilloscope, verify flyback spike at collector of MJL21194G: target peak ≥100V (>200V is better)
- Adjust the 1kΩ trigger pot until oscillation is crisp and repeatable (not intermittent, not continuous)
- Run for 1 hour. Measure input power (WT310E) and battery B voltage rise. Verify cap-dump fires correctly (LM311 should fire IRFP260N when cap reaches setpoint)
Programme the Teensy 4.1 with the battery rotation logic:
// Simplified battery swap controller logic // Relays: R1=A→drive, R2=B→charge, R3=C→rest void loop() { if (millis() - lastSwap > SWAP_INTERVAL_MS) { lastSwap = millis(); rotateBatteryRoles(); // A→C (rest), B→A (drive), C→B (charge) logSoC(); // read coulomb counters delay(500); // relay settle time } } // SWAP_INTERVAL_MS = 300000 (5 min) to 3600000 (60 min) // Determine optimal interval empirically per battery chemistry
Connect Omron G7L relays to Teensy digital outputs via 4N35 optoisolators. Use MBR3045 Schottky diodes on each battery terminal in blocking polarity.
Phase 4 — Mechanical Assembly
Fabricate a non-magnetic frame from aluminium profile (Bosch Rexroth 40×40mm T-slot extrusion) or 316 stainless steel (non-magnetic). The three stator rings mount concentrically on this frame. Design requirements:
- Rings must be coplanar to ±0.1mm over their full diameter
- Ring spacing (radially) must allow 0.5–1.0mm air gap to rollers
- Roller bearing housings must allow each roller to spin freely (ceramic bearings preferred, no magnetic interference)
- The whole assembly must be statically balanced (check with bubble level; dynamic balance after initial spin-up)
Mount the three stator rings onto the frame. Each roller rides in a carriage that:
- Holds the roller at the correct radial distance (0.5–1.0mm gap to ring face)
- Allows the roller to orbit the ring (roller carriage rotates around ring axis)
- Allows the roller to spin on its own axis (via ceramic ball bearings, ZrO₂ preferred)
Install Hall-effect sensors (SS495A) at one reference position per ring to measure roller orbital speed and provide commutation trigger for the drive ESC.
Fix the pre-wound toroid coil stations onto the ring frame at their designated angular positions. Final gap check: use non-magnetic feeler gauge (plastic or brass) between each coil core and the nearest roller path. Adjust mounting until gap = 0.75±0.25mm at all stations. Secure with M3 stainless bolts and Loctite 243 thread-locker.
Mount the three IPC boards on the frame (non-magnetic standoffs, away from ring flux). Run ≥1kV-rated PTFE wire from each coil station's Filar B and C leads to the board. Connect boards to cap-dump bus and to the battery management swap controller. Enclose all high-voltage connections in insulated terminal blocks (Phoenix Contact or Wago) rated ≥1kV.
Phase 5 — Startup Procedure
- Confirm all IPC high-voltage paths are insulated and no exposed conductors are accessible during operation
- Verify cap-dump bleeder resistors (10kΩ, 5W) are in place across each 22,000µF cap — these discharge caps when power is removed
- Confirm all three batteries are at 50% SoC (not full — gives room to measure gain) and baseline-logged (terminal voltage after 1-hr rest, internal resistance)
- Set oscilloscope on Filar C output and BJT collector. Set Yokogawa WT310E to measure Battery A input power
- Ensure fire extinguisher (CO₂ type) is accessible. Venting batteries produce hydrogen — no open flames
Apply 3-phase AC drive signal from VFD to Filar A of all ring coils (connected in the appropriate 3-phase configuration for the number of coil stations per ring). Start VFD at 1 Hz and ramp at 0.5 Hz/second. Watch for:
- Rollers beginning to orbit their respective rings — first visible motion typically at 2–5 Hz
- Current draw should rise then plateau as rollers settle into magnetic equilibrium
- Any mechanical interference (chattering, grinding) → STOP immediately and re-check gaps
- Target ramp-up RPM: 300–600 RPM orbital speed of rollers around Ring 3 axis
Once rollers are orbiting at target RPM:
- Verify flyback pulses are present on oscilloscope (Filar B output → UF4007 → cap bank). Expected: sharp spikes at roller-pass frequency × coil-station count
- Verify cap voltage is rising (LM311 setpoint not yet reached during initial ramp-up)
- Once cap reaches comparator setpoint, verify IRFP260N fires (dump to Battery B)
- Adjust 1kΩ trigger pot on each board for maximum cap charge rate while maintaining stable oscillation
This is the critical Searl-effect test. At steady RPM with VFD driving:
- Gradually reduce VFD output power while monitoring roller RPM
- If the SEG self-spins (RPM holds or increases as drive is reduced), this is the Roschin-Godin threshold phenomenon
- If RPM drops proportionally with drive reduction (expected in a conventional motor), document the drag-torque vs RPM curve for later analysis
- At no point disconnect the drive abruptly — ramp down gradually to avoid transient voltage spikes
CoP Measurement Protocol
Adapted from Perry (2024) Fig. 5 methodology, extended for the SEG's combined electromechanical output.
| Stage | Action | Instrument | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-test | Charge all 3 batteries to 50% SoC. Rest 60 min. | Midtronics MDX-650 | V_A₀, V_B₀, V_C₀, SoC%, internal resistance of each |
| Stage A: Spin-up | Ramp VFD to target RPM. Log all energy in. | WT310E on VFD output | E_spin (Wh): integral of P(t)dt from t=0 to target RPM |
| Stage B: Run (60 min) | Operate at steady RPM. Log Battery A discharge, Battery B charge accumulation. | WT310E + coulomb counters | E_A_consumed (Wh), V_B(t), I_B(t), T_coil(t), RPM(t) |
| Stage C: Rest | Stop. Disconnect all batteries. Rest 60 min. | Timer | All batteries resting (surface charge dissipates) |
| Stage D: Discharge A | Discharge Battery A through precision load at C/20 to 10V cutoff. | WT310E + precision load | E_A_discharge (Wh) |
| Stage E: Discharge B | Discharge Battery B through precision load at C/20 to 10V cutoff. | WT310E + precision load | E_B_discharge (Wh) |
| CoP Battery | CoP_batt = E_B_discharge / (E_A₀ − E_A_discharge) | Calculation | Target: CoP_batt > 1.0 |
| CoP System | CoP_sys = (E_B_discharge + E_mech_out) / (E_spin + E_A_consumed) | Calculation | E_mech_out from torque × angular velocity if shaft coupled to alternator |
Self-Loop Operations
A true self-sustaining loop — where the SEG powers itself from its own IPC output with no net battery drain — would be the strongest evidence for Searl's claims. The following protocol operationalises this test while maintaining rigorous measurement standards.
Once the SEG is running with battery swap controller active:
- Log all three battery terminal voltages and internal resistances after 1-hour rest each day (disconnect device, wait 1 hour, measure, reconnect)
- Log daily: V_A, V_B, V_C, R_int_A, R_int_B, R_int_C, accumulated coulombs per battery
- True self-sustaining operation = no net SoC decline in any battery over 7 days
- Gradual SoC increase across all three = CoP > 1 (excess energy charging batteries overall)
- Gradual SoC decrease = CoP < 1 (battery bank is being consumed — stop and analyse)
The following variables have the highest impact on measured CoP, per Perry's research:
- Pulse repetition frequency (PRF): Determined by RPM × rollers × coil stations. Target the battery's optimal PRF. Vary RPM in 50 RPM steps and log CoP change.
- Peak flyback voltage: Adjust via 1kΩ trigger pot on each board. Higher voltage generally improves CoP but risks BJT damage. Monitor temperature of MJL21194G with thermocouple.
- Battery capacity: Perry found higher-capacity batteries (larger "capture cross-section") show higher CoP at similar internal resistance. If CoP is below 1, try a 30Ah battery instead of 18Ah as Battery B.
- Swap interval: Perry's exploratory work suggested 15–30 minutes per role as a starting point for LiFePO₄. Vary from 5 to 60 minutes and log effect on net SoC trend.
Safety Requirements
| Hazard | Risk | Control |
|---|---|---|
| Flyback HV spike (200–800V) | Electric shock, cardiac arrest | All HV paths insulated with ≥1kV-rated PTFE wire. Cap bleeder resistors always fitted. Power off and wait 60s before any physical access. Insulated gloves (Class 00, rated 500V) when working near HV nodes. One-hand-in-pocket rule when probing. |
| Battery short circuit | Fire, explosion, severe burns | All battery connections through 40A automotive fuses. Use insulated ring terminals and silicone-covered flexible leads. No metallic jewellery when working on battery connections. CO₂ fire extinguisher within 1m of device. |
| NdFeB magnetic crush | Crush injury, broken bones | Large NdFeB rings (Ring 3) can exert hundreds of Newtons of attraction force to steel tools and nearby magnets. Use non-magnetic tools (Al, Cu, brass, G10 composite). Never bring two large ring magnets within 100mm of each other without a controlled jig. Store in individual wooden cases. |
| Rotating rollers (kinetic energy) | Ejection of rollers if containment fails | Enclose the ring-roller assembly in a polycarbonate containment shield (≥10mm, rated for roller ejection). Never stand directly in the plane of the rings during high-RPM operation. Use remote operation (camera + monitor) above 300 RPM. |
| Battery off-gassing (H₂) | Explosion if ignited | Operate in well-ventilated space. No open flames or sparks within 1m of batteries. LiFePO₄ preferred (lower off-gassing than lead-acid). If lead-acid used, mandatory forced-air ventilation. |
| Corona discharge (20–30kV) | Cardiac arrest from even micro-amp currents at lethal voltage | Electret charging step (Phase 1 Step 5) to be performed only by one trained person with a second trained observer present. HV supply must be current-limited to ≤1mA. Insulated gloves rated Class E (30kV) required. HV supply has a physical key that is held by the operator at all times. |
| RF/EMI from flyback pulses | Interference with pacemakers, medical devices | Anyone with a cardiac pacemaker or implanted medical device must stay ≥5m from the operating device. Shield IPC boards with grounded aluminium enclosures. |
Credits & Acknowledgements
This build manual draws on decades of work by independent researchers, engineers, and physicists operating largely outside mainstream funding structures. Their contributions — whether ultimately vindicated or not by experiment — form the intellectual foundation of this project. The following individuals and organisations deserve explicit credit.
| Name | Contribution | Period | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| John Roy Robert Searl (1932–2018) |
Inventor of the SEG concept; documented the ring-roller layered composite design, segmented pole magnetisation, and claimed self-sustaining electromagnetic effect | 1946 – 2018 | Searl reported first observing anomalous motor behaviour at age 14 while working as an apprentice electrician. His claims were never independently replicated to peer-reviewed standard during his lifetime, but he maintained and developed his theory consistently over seven decades. His published work and interviews remain the primary source for the SEG's material specifications. |
| Julian Perry Kerrow Energetics, UK |
IPC research, CoP > 1 documentation, open-science methodology, battery electrochemistry analysis, Perry (2024) and Perry (2025) published studies | 2018 – present | Perry's rigorous application of the Open Science Framework to IPC experiments — with pre-registration, public data, and uncertainty quantification — represents the most methodologically sound work in this field. His "Inductive Pulse Charging: What, How & Why?" paper is the direct theoretical source for the IPC integration in this manual. |
| John C. Bedini (1945–2016) |
Monopole energiser / SG circuit topology; bifilar coil methodology; NDR transistor selection for flyback harvesting; rotor-based pulse generation; TeslagenX battery chargers | 1984 – 2016 | Bedini's "Simplified School Girl" (SSG) circuit — released publicly in 2001 — became the reference design from which the IPC community developed. His identification of the MJL21194G transistor's NDR behaviour and his bifilar winding protocol are directly embedded in this build. Patents: US6,545,444 (2003) and US7,109,671 (2006). |
| Robert G. Adams (1920–2010), New Zealand |
Adams Pulse Motor; magnetic reluctance motor design principles; flyback pulse recovery; low-supply-current motor topology; coil gauge and turns-ratio methodology | 1969 – 2010 | Adams, as Chairman of the NZ Institute of Electrical Engineers, brought engineering rigour to pulse-motor design. His joint patent with Harold Aspden (GB2282708A, 1993) documents the wire-gauge, magnet-strength, and coil-geometry principles adopted in Section 11 of this manual. |
| Harold Aspden (1927–2011), UK |
Theoretical framework for anomalous energy in electromagnetic systems; IBM Director of European Patents; joint inventor with Adams; aether physics models | 1957 – 2011 | Aspden's background in patent law and theoretical physics gave the Adams motor its most rigorous documentation. His theoretical contributions — while outside mainstream physics — provide a structured explanatory framework for the pulse-motor community's observations. |
| Nikola Tesla (1856–1943) |
Unidirectional pulse methodology ("Method of Conversion"); bifilar coil patent (US512,340, 1894); observations on "electro-radiant events"; longitudinal wave theory; single-wire power transmission | 1880s – 1920s | Tesla's 1893 lecture "On Light and Other High Frequency Phenomena" is the intellectual origin of the IPC lineage. His description of pulsed DC as qualitatively different from AC — capable of effects not predicted by Hertzian electromagnetic theory — remains the theoretical touchstone for this entire field. |
| Daniel M. Cook | First documented anomalous energy gains from uni-directional inductive pulses; Cook (1871) patent — the earliest known prior art for IPC | 1871 | Cook's US Patent 119,825A ("Improvements in Induction Coils", 1871) is the earliest documented observation of anomalous energy behaviour in inductive pulse circuits, predating Tesla's work by a decade. Perry identifies this as the origin point of the IPC lineage. |
| Gabriel Kron (1901–1968) |
Negative resistor development at GE/Stanford; open-path circuit theory; Kron (1945) — lamellar currents and second rectangular transformation matrix | 1930s – 1960s | As chief scientist on the US Navy Network Analyzer project at Stanford, Kron developed practical negative resistors and, according to colleagues, could disconnect a generator because the negative resistor would power the circuit via "open paths". His theoretical work provides one of the more technically grounded frameworks for CoP > 1 claims. |
| Thomas E. Bearden (1930–2022) |
Heaviside non-divergent energy component theory; MEG (Motionless Electromagnetic Generator); source charge problem resolution; vacuum energy extraction framework | 1970s – 2020s | Bearden's "Energy from the Vacuum: Concepts & Principles" (2004) is the most systematic attempt to provide a theoretical foundation for over-unity electromagnetic devices. While not accepted by mainstream physics, his framework — particularly the Heaviside energy component and dipole asymmetry arguments — is extensively cited in the IPC literature and informs the theoretical discussion in Section 8 of this manual. |
| Vladimir Roschin & Serge Godin Russian Academy of Sciences |
MEC (Magnetic Energy Converter) — closest documented replication of SEG-type device; reported 7 kW output, self-spin above 550 RPM, magnetic wall structures, and anomalous cooling | Late 1990s | Roschin and Godin's replication attempt — conducted within a credentialled institution using calibrated instruments — remains the most significant attempted verification of Searl-type claims. Their reported observations (weight reduction, anomalous temperature gradients, magnetic wall structures at specific radii) have not been independently reproduced. The original prototype was reportedly stolen. |
| Peter Lindemann & Aaron Murakami | Bedini SG documentation and publication; "Bedini SG: The Complete Beginner's and Intermediate Handbooks"; battery swap methodology; split-the-positive topology; A&P Electronic Media | 2010s – present | Lindemann and Murakami performed the essential work of systematising and publishing Bedini's circuit knowledge in reproducible form. Their handbooks are the primary practical reference for the IPC harvesting circuit design in Sections 11 and 15 of this manual. |
| Eric P. Dollard | Longitudinal Magneto-Dielectric (LMD) wave theory; replication of Tesla experiments; scalar wave documentation; "Transverse & Longitudinal Electric Waves" (1988) | 1980s – present | Dollard's experimental replication of Tesla's single-wire power transmission and his theoretical framework distinguishing "transference" from "displacement" provide the conceptual basis for the scalar/LMD wave discussion in this manual. His work through Borderland Sciences Research Foundation is the most technically rigorous in this lineage. |
| Ilya Prigogine (1917–2003) |
Dissipative structures theory; non-equilibrium thermodynamics; Nobel Prize in Chemistry (1977); theoretical basis for Type B energetic reactions and far-from-equilibrium systems | 1960s – 2003 | Prigogine's Nobel Prize-winning work on dissipative structures provides the only fully mainstream-accepted theoretical framework that could, in principle, accommodate over-unity Coefficient of Performance in open thermodynamic systems. His work is the scientific foundation for Perry's open thermodynamics argument. |
If you replicate, extend, or publish results based on this build manual, please credit the primary sources above and use the following attribution for the integrated SEG-IPC design synthesis:
// Suggested citation for this manual: SEG-IPC Integrated Generator Build Manual (2026). Synthesised from: Searl (1946–2018), Perry (2024–2025), Bedini (1984–2016), Adams & Aspden (GB2282708A, 1993). Available: [your repository URL] Licence: CC BY 4.0 — share freely with attribution.
For any published paper arising from experiments with this device, the following references should be cited in full (see Section 18). At minimum, cite Perry (2024), Bedini (US6,545,444), and Roschin & Godin (2000) as the closest prior experimental art.
References & Bibliography
References are grouped by category. All URLs verified at time of compilation. DOI links are permanent; web URLs may change.
| Reference | Type | Relevance to this build |
|---|---|---|
| Perry, J. (2024). Inductive Pulse Charging with Electrochemical Systems — Key Findings of the 1st OSF Study. Journal of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, 3(4), 01–15. Kerrow Energetics, UK. | Peer-reviewed journal article | Primary source for all IPC CoP measurements, methodology (Fig. 5 protocol), battery type comparisons, and NDR transistor selection. OSF pre-registration: osf.io/ZTFUB |
| Perry, J. (2025). Inductive Pulse Charging with Electrochemical Systems — 2nd OSF Study Results. Journal of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, 4(5), 01–14. Kerrow Energetics, UK. | Peer-reviewed journal article | Follow-on study; documents LiFePO4 CoP up to ~38, solid-state vs rotor-based switching comparison, and cap-dump optimisation. |
| Perry, J. (2023). Inductive Pulse Charging: What, How & Why? Kerrow Energetics, UK. [Conference paper / preprint] | Preprint / conference paper | Foundational overview paper — directly reproduced in the uploaded research documents for this project. Source for IPC history, open thermodynamics framing, Heaviside component theory, and measurement methodology. |
| Cook, D.M. (1871). Improvements in Induction Coils. US Patent 119,825A. US Patent and Trademark Office. patents.google.com | Patent (1871) | Earliest documented observation of anomalous energy gains in uni-directional inductive pulse circuits. First prior art for IPC. |
| Tesla, N. (1893). On Light and Other High Frequency Phenomena. Nature, 48, 136–140. doi:10.1038/048136b0 | Published lecture | Tesla's description of pulsed DC as qualitatively distinct from AC; the intellectual origin of the IPC lineage. Documents "electro-radiant" phenomena observed with sharp unidirectional pulses. |
| Tesla, N. (1894). Coil for Electro-Magnets. US Patent 512,340. patents.google.com | Patent | The bifilar flat coil patent. Foundation for the trifilar winding approach in Section 10 of this manual. |
| Bedini, J.C. (2003). Device and Method for Pulse Charging a Battery and for Driving Other Devices with a Pulse. US Patent 6,545,444. | Patent | The cap-dump circuit patent. Covers the comparator-triggered capacitor discharge topology used in Section 11 of this manual. |
| Bedini, J.C. (2006). Permanent Magnetic Motor-Generator. US Patent 7,109,671. | Patent | Bedini's rotor-based pulse motor generator patent. Documents the trigger-coil and power-coil separation principle used in the SEG coil winding design. |
| Lindemann, P. & Murakami, A. (2013). Bedini SG: The Complete Intermediate Handbook. A&P Electronic Media. emediapress.com | Technical handbook | Reference for coil winding specification, MJL21194G transistor selection, battery swap protocol, and cap-dump circuit details. Section 15 (self-loop methodology) draws directly from this work. |
| Amanor-Boadu, J.M. (2018). The Impact of Pulse Charging Parameters on the Life Cycle of Lithium-Ion Polymer Batteries. Energies, 11(8), 2162. doi:10.3390/en11082162 | Peer-reviewed journal article | Mainstream peer-reviewed evidence that pulse charging improves battery cycle life vs constant-current charging. Supports the IPC approach from a conventional battery science perspective. |
| Cooper, R.B. (2002). Pulse Charging Lead-Acid Batteries to Improve Performance and Reverse the Effects of Sulfation. MSc thesis, West Virginia University. WVU Repository | MSc thesis | Peer-reviewed evidence for pulse charging effects on lead-acid battery sulphation. Supports the electrochemical mechanism hypothesis for IPC energy gains. |
| Reference | Type | Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Roschin, V.V. & Godin, S.M. (2000). An Experimental Investigation of the Physical Effects in a Dynamic Magnetic System of the Searl Type. New Energy Technologies, 1(1). Russian Academy of Sciences. | Experimental report | The most significant documented replication attempt of SEG-type behaviour. Reports self-spin above 550 RPM, 7 kW output, weight reduction of ~35%, anomalous cooling, and magnetic wall structures at specific radii. Not independently reproduced. |
| Adams, R.G. & Aspden, H. (1993). Electrical Motor-Generator. UK Patent GB2282708A. patents.google.com | Patent | The Adams-Aspden motor-generator patent. Source for coil wire gauge, magnet strength selection, supply current minimisation, and commutation timing principles in Section 11. |
| Bearden, T.E. (2004). Energy from the Vacuum: Concepts & Principles. Cheniere Press. ISBN: 0972514945. | Book | Systematic theoretical framework for electromagnetic over-unity devices. Source for Heaviside non-divergent energy component, source charge problem, and dipole asymmetry arguments in Section 8. |
| Barrett, T.W. (2008). Topological Foundations of Electromagnetism. World Scientific Series in Contemporary Chemical Physics, Vol. 26. doi:10.1142/6693 | Academic monograph | Peer-reviewed academic treatment of electromagnetic phenomena outside the Maxwell-Heaviside framework. Lists EM phenomena not explained by standard Maxwell equations. |
| Anastasovski, P.K. et al. (2000). [O(3) Electrodynamics]. Physica Scripta, 61, 513. doi:10.1238/Physica.Regular.061a00513 | Peer-reviewed journal article | Peer-reviewed treatment of extended electrodynamics including magnetic charge and current density terms excluded from standard Maxwell-Heaviside equations. Supports the theoretical framework for anomalous IPC effects. |
| Gray, E. (1985). Efficient Electrical Conversion Switching Tube Suitable for Inductive Loads. US Patent 4,661,747. patents.google.com | Patent | Edwin Gray's switching tube patent. Historical precedent for cold-electricity / NDR switching devices. Informed Bedini's transistor selection methodology. |
| Moddel, G., Weerakkody, A., Doroski, D. & Bartusiak, D. (2021). Casimir-Cavity-Induced Conductance Changes. Physical Review Research, 3, L022007. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L022007 | Peer-reviewed journal article | Mainstream peer-reviewed evidence for coupling between the Zero Point Field and regular matter at boundary conditions. Supports Perry's Type B energetic reaction framework. |
| Hotta, M. (2013). Ground-State-Entanglement Bound for Quantum Energy Teleportation of General Spin-Chain Models. Physical Review A, 87, 032313. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.87.032313 | Peer-reviewed journal article | Theoretical basis for "quantum energy teleportation" — negative energy states and energy transfer between entangled particles. Tested on IBM quantum computers; relevant to vacuum energy accessibility arguments. |
| Reference | Type | Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Prigogine, I. (1975). Dissipative Structures, Dynamics and Entropy. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 9(S9), 443–456. doi:10.1002/qua.560090854 | Peer-reviewed journal article | Nobel Prize-winning foundational paper on dissipative structures. The only fully mainstream scientific framework that accommodates locally negentropic energy organisation in open systems — the theoretical basis for CoP > 1 in IPC open thermodynamic systems. |
| Sheehan, D. (2022). Beyond the Thermodynamic Limit: Template for Second Law Violators. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 36(3), 473–483. doi:10.31275/20222593 | Peer-reviewed journal article | Documents experimental cases where the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics has been locally violated or circumvented. Provides theoretical grounding for Type B energy reactions. |
| Lee, J.W. (2022). Type-B Energetic Processes and Their Associated Scientific Implications. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 36(3), 487–495. doi:10.31275/20222517 | Peer-reviewed journal article | Defines the Type A / Type B energetic reaction distinction. Type B reactions — characterised by asymmetric boundary conditions and non-strict adherence to the 2nd Law — are the theoretical basis for anomalous IPC effects. |
| Jaeger, H.M. & Liu, A.J. (2010). Far-From-Equilibrium Physics: An Overview. Condensed Matter and Material Physics decadal study report. arXiv:1009.4874 | Review article (mainstream) | Mainstream review of far-from-equilibrium physics. Establishes the scientific context for boundary-condition energy dynamics relevant to the SEG multi-layer composite interfaces. |
| Ackerman, M.L. et al. (2016). Anomalous Dynamical Behaviour of Freestanding Graphene Membranes. Physical Review Letters, 117, 126801. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.126801 | Peer-reviewed journal article | Mainstream PRL paper documenting anomalous thermodynamic behaviour at material boundaries. Supports Perry's argument that boundary conditions are sites of freely accessible energy. |
| Reference | Type | Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Choi, Y.S. et al. (2020). Nylon-11 Nanowires for Triboelectric Energy Harvesting. EcoMat, 2(1). doi:10.1002/eom2.12063 | Peer-reviewed journal article | Mainstream evidence for triboelectric energy harvesting from Nylon-11, directly relevant to the electret charging of the SEG nylon outer shell in Phase 1 Step 5. |
| Halbach, K. (1980). Design of Permanent Multipole Magnets with Oriented Rare Earth Cobalt Material. Nuclear Instruments and Methods, 169(1), 1–10. doi:10.1016/0029-554X(80)90094-4 | Peer-reviewed journal article | Original Halbach array paper. The pole-rotation sequence and one-sided flux concentration principle applied to the SEG segmented magnetisation design derives from this work. |
| Schmidt-Rohr, K. (2018). How Batteries Store and Release Energy: Explaining Basic Electrochemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 95, 1801–1810. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00479 | Peer-reviewed journal article | Source for battery electrochemistry fundamentals — Gibbs free energy, Nernst equation, and the distinction between terminal voltage and internal energy state. Informs the CoP measurement protocol in Section 14. |
| Braun, J. et al. (2022). State of Charge and State of Health Diagnosis of Batteries with Voltage-Controlled Models. Journal of Power Sources, 544, 231828. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231828 | Peer-reviewed journal article | Battery SoC and SoH methodology. Informs the battery health monitoring and Midtronics conductance testing protocol in the CoP measurement section. |
| Lee, T.D. & Yang, C.N. (1956). Question of Parity Conservation in Weak Interactions. Physical Review, 104, 254. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.104.254 | Peer-reviewed journal article (Nobel Prize) | Nobel Prize-winning paper on symmetry breaking phenomena. Cited in the IPC literature (Perry, Bearden) as confirmation that broken symmetry — the physical basis for the IPC source-charge / dipole asymmetry argument — is a mainstream-accepted physical phenomenon. |
| Morée, G. (2022). Comparison of Poynting's Vector and the Power Flow Used in Electrical Engineering. AIP Advances, 12, 085219. doi:10.1063/5.0101339 | Peer-reviewed journal article | Mainstream treatment of the Poynting vector and energy flow around conductors — relevant to the Heaviside non-divergent energy component discussion in Section 8. |
| Resource | URL | Content |
|---|---|---|
| Kerrow Energetics | kerrowenergetics.org.uk | Perry's IPC research hub. Full OSF study data, patent list, and preprints. |
| Open Science Framework — IPC Study | osf.io/ZTFUB | Pre-registered IPC study with timestamped protocol, raw data, and results. |
| FEMM (Finite Element Method Magnetics) | femm.info | Free 2D magnetics FEA software. Run the Lua scripts supplied with this build. |
| OpenSCAD | openscad.org | Free parametric CAD. Open the .scad files supplied with this build. |
| A&P Electronic Media (Bedini SG) | emediapress.com | Lindemann and Murakami handbooks; Bedini SG intermediate and advanced guides. |
| Energy Science Forum | energyscienceforum.com | Community forum for IPC / pulse motor replicators. Transistor comparisons, circuit variants, results sharing. |
| Eric Dollard — EPD Laboratories | ericpdollard.com | Dollard's LMD wave papers, Tesla experiment replications, and wireless power transmission work. |
| SEARL Magnetics | searlmagnetics.com | Official continuation of Searl's work post-2018. Material specifications and magnetisation guidance. |
| JLCPCB (PCB fabrication) | jlcpcb.com | Upload the Gerber files in this package. Select 2oz copper, FR4 1.6mm, HASL or ENIG. |
| KiCad Gerber Viewer | kicad.org | Free PCB design suite. Use GerbView to verify the Gerber files before ordering. |